Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi: Obama can’t control Putin
thehill.com ^ | July 27, 2014 | Julian Hattem

Posted on 07/27/2014 1:16:25 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: maine-iac7
No, he's not. He's in love with them. His mistress is a Tatar muslim.

Putin appointed Ramzan Kadyrov, the jihadist son of the Chechen mufti, as Sultan for life of Chechnya and paid him billions as tribute to rebuild Chechnya. Kadyrov is instituting sharia law on Russian soil with Putin's blessing, and has built the largest mosque in Europe there.

Putin has never attacked any muslim nation. He is at war with his Christian neighbors and he sends Chechen muslims to kill Orthodox Christians in Georgia and Ukraine.

61 posted on 07/28/2014 10:24:33 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

“now the West must surrender”

So if we don’t “control” Russia and determine what happens in former Soviet territory, we’re surrendering? That’s insane.


62 posted on 07/28/2014 12:29:51 PM PDT by Hugin ("Do yourself a favor--first thing, get a firearm!"</i><p>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

If NATO is too weak to defend the world from Russia, then they must submit to your goal, and Russia’s expansionism.

That is why Finland and Sweden are considering joining NATO, because they too fear Russia’s conquest of empire.


63 posted on 07/28/2014 12:33:08 PM PDT by ansel12 (LEGAL immigrants, 30 million 1980-2012, continues to remake the nation's electorate for democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

You simultaneously say Russia is weak and on the verge of collapse, and yet it’s a threat to conquer the entire world, when they have done nothing beyond the borders of the old USSR. Given the fact that Russia has been invaded multiple times throughout their history, and now people like you want to “control” them, they have every reason to be worried about NATO expanding into their former territory.

I’m not a fan of Putin. He’s a thug, but most world leaders are. I have no “goal”, other than keeping the hell out of it. If the Ukrainians value their independence they are capable of defending it themselves.


64 posted on 07/28/2014 12:48:27 PM PDT by Hugin ("Do yourself a favor--first thing, get a firearm!"</i><p>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
I didn't say that they are on the verge of collapse, they are vastly weaker than they were when they were a massive and evil empire when I was last in the military and part of NATO, and they talked like you still do now, calling resistance to their invasions and conquest, "controlling" them.

You do have a side as Russia moves to empire, you support it.

You are calling for the free world to stay out of them reconquering "Soviet Territory, which of course includes many NATO countries.

"So if we don’t “control” Russia and determine what happens in former Soviet territory, we’re surrendering? That’s insane."

65 posted on 07/28/2014 12:57:13 PM PDT by ansel12 (LEGAL immigrants, 30 million 1980-2012, continues to remake the nation's electorate for democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson