Posted on 07/22/2014 11:39:28 AM PDT by Kaslin
And he is only black under the old, racist "one drop" rule. He is one eighth black, seven eighths white (Arab is white, like it or not).
Remember the 1/20/09 bumper stickers from back in '06-'07-'08? Are there 1/20/17 bumper stickers now available?
Racist.
I don’t believe Obama is ‘black’ in the sense it refers to African blood line. He is dark skinned as are many people throughout the world. I was often accused of being a negro because of dark skin especially in summer with a tan. Obama was sired by a dark skinned Indonesian guru named Subuh but because of circumstances he was born in Kenya, and that is where the tale of his being ‘black’ comes from.
You are picking off the fly specks from the cottage cheese. I call him “BLACK” because he calls himself “BLACK”. The LAMESTREAM MEDIA calls him “BLACK”. The head of the DOJ, Eric Holder call himself and the president “BLACK”. So, until they call themselves something different, I’ll call him “BLACK”.
It just might not be flyspecks on some cottage cheese. I believe it is a very substantial/significant difference in Obama’s case and background accounts between being a bona fide ‘black’ person and a seemingly ‘black’ person. I don’t disparage either kind of person as having close friendships with both over my many years
In a nut shell.
You, my friend, are talking in circles. Let me ask you this, does OBAMA call himself “BLACK”? Does Eric Holder call himself “BLACK”? So, the next time OBAMA calls himself something different, I will agree with him. That doesn’t change the subject, that People in Washington are afraid to draw impeachment papers on him, because he said he was “BLACK”
1. I'm not Sara.I'm her mom.Hense my name, sarasmom.
2. There are any number of reputable sources that have extensively researched and sourced data about the supposedly religiously based NGO’s, that are harvesting hundreds of millions of Federal grants every year, yet are not affiliated with any specific denomination or group of churches, nor are they involved in any direct charitable activities.
3.If you care enough to look into it, and actually ask around amidst your own circles of knowledge,(assuming you have them) you might discover there is a very tangled web involved with these unaffiliated NGOs, that receive a hell of a lot of taxpayer funded cash grants from the feds.
As of mid 2014:
US Conference of Catholic Bishops, and/or, US Catholic Charities $70,000,000.00 (lazy slackers//# sarcasm!)
Southwest Key Programs Inc $122,000,000.00
Baptist Child and Family Services $270,000,000.00
Start by simply asking leaders of your own local church, and/or members of other churches in your local community, if they have been contacted by/or are affiliated with, any of these three organizations.
Ask friends of friends to ask.
The feds hate it when we citizens speak quietly amongst ourselves, and verbally compare notes, instead of simply consuming the proffered information. If you are seriously curious in finding the truth about what is happening, you have to talk to real live people, not just read what is fed you.
What’s your beef? If you want to take Obama as a ‘black African’ that is your choice. However, as for me I don’t consider an Indonesian or all dark skinned persons as a ‘black’ person.
I’m okay with that. But would you want him IMPEACHED? That really was the question.
I believe Obama is as much eligible for impeachment as Nixon was. Nixon knew public opinion and politicals were after him and decided it would be more honorable for him and history to resign. Obama has crossed the line of honor but 50% of the Nation and his cadre of insiders including Muslims, are not after Obama. Obama and his ilk care not at all for the USA. This is a/the big difference between Nixon and Obama.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.