[Enlightened1]

Another MASSIVE VICTORY! That's a Hat Trick!

[bboop]

Praise God.

[BuckeyeTexan]

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

[Signalman]

Today’s score:

Freedom 2

Tyranny 0

[I want the USA back]

This is good. But the best part it that it will give the administration indigestion.

[Triple]

So, is just part of the law unconstitutional?

Is this the only part?

Does the USSC get effectively ‘line item veto’?

TIA,

3

[headless_thompson_gunner]

How ON EARTH will one be able secure their $9.50 / month contraception if insurance doesn't 'pay for it'??? I'm without speech.

[dontBSme]

Wonder how long it will be before Delirious Dingy, the Left Coast Harridan and Little Zero call for a Constitutional Amendment abolishing the Supreme Court?

[tflabo]

And to think that if just one tyrant judge vote flipped the other way would have resulted in a disaster and a corruption of constitutional protected freedoms.

[Starboard]

Great news! Thanks for posting.

[JPG]

damn....just damn

[savedbygrace]

One interpretation I’m hearing is that it will allow the administration to issue a regulation saying that the fedgov will pay for this.

IOW, the USSC ruling says “closely help corporations” don’t have to pay for it, but rather, millions of individual taxpayers WILL be forced to pay for it.

That’s just GREAT. /sarc

[jonno]

For some schadenfreude you can visit:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014836559

[topher]

WOW! Just WOW!

[ArmstedFragg]

Very narrow decision. Applies only to closely held corporations. Government workaround is just to pay for BC directly.

[bboop]

EWTN’s comment on FB -

“EWTN is extremely pleased with today’s Supreme Court decision in the Hobby Lobby case. The fact that the Court believes that the government has less restrictive means of accomplishing its goals is very helpful. However, it remains unclear whether this decision addresses the serious objections that EWTN has raised with regard to the government’s “accommodation” scheme for nonprofit faith-based organizations. We are consulting with our legal team to determine how this significant decision applies to EWTN and our pending case before the courts.”

[coloradan]

If the provision was found to be illegal, then someone committed a crime. Who was it, and what will the sentence be?

[Lucas McCain]

I’m guessing that heads are exploding over at Democratic Underground today. I’d go check but I don’t want to get dirty.

[Biggirl]

Supremes have FOUND their SPINE.

[youngidiot]

The libs on Facebook are losing their minds over this. Hahahaha

[cripplecreek]

Twitter

Senator Harry Reid @SenatorReid

If the Supreme Court will not protect women’s access to health care, then Democrats will.