Replies

1 posted on 06/26/2014 7:51:40 AM PDT by dware

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last

To: dware

Duh.

44 posted on 06/26/2014 10:25:48 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)

To: dware

57 posted on 06/26/2014 6:17:15 PM PDT by Coleus

To: topher

Formal title of case:

McCullen v. Coakley (short title)

No. 12-1168

Long Title:

Eleanor McCullen, et al., Petitioners
v.
Martha Coakley, Attorney General of Massachusetts, et al.

Link to SCOTUS page on this page with full history:

60 posted on 06/27/2014 9:26:07 AM PDT by topher (Traditional values -- especially family values -- which have been proven over time.)

To: dware

Am I missing something?

Seriously. When something is unanimous in the SCOTUS or congress, it usually winds up a disaster. But this SEEMS like a good thing!

Is there any drawback?

61 posted on 06/27/2014 10:35:02 PM PDT by Forgotten Amendments (Peace On Earth! Purity of Essence! McCain/Ripper 2016)

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794