Ping.
(Walid Shoebat / RightScoop)
It also turns out that the official terms of Nakoula’s parole in 2009 was bogus, and that the administration used his parole as leverage to help him with their agenda: To create a climate for non-Muslim governments to enact laws that make criticism of Islam a criminal offense.
(Me, October 29, 2012 1:06:13 PM · 17 of 59)
What else happened in April? Perhaps a little slush money goes the way of someone that could be controlled (on parole for computer crimes), Nakoula Basseley Nakoula posing as Israeli citizen Sam Bacile in California? He is actually Egyptian. He is put together with Alan Roberts, a onetime porn filmmaker who hadn’t made a movie in 18 years http://www.salon.com/topic/innocence_of_muslims/ . By June “The Innocence of Muslims” is made depicting the prophet Muhammad as a fraud, coward, murderer, and pedophile.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/2951831/posts?page=17#17
BOOM. It takes a FReeper to get it right... again.
.
I don’t believe the filmmaker is a Muslim. If he were, he would not have insulted the [so-call] prophet with his movie trailer. He would know that is an automatic death sentence. People say, ‘but it is taqqiya’. No; insulting the prophet is not taqqiya. Taqqiya is lying to the advantage of Islam. It is never considered to Islam’s advantage to insult the prophet:
‘the clerics emphatically called for the death of a Muslim man who tore the Koran on YouTube — and anyone else, including non-Muslims, who dare offend Islam. A section follows:
… After the video of the man tearing the Koran was played, one of three guests, a bearded and white-robed Dr. Mahmoud Sha’ban, visibly shaken by what he had just seen, said:
Someone like him must receive the punishment he deserves, and it is death. He is an apostate”¦ It is clear from what he says that he is a Muslim, and must be killed as an apostate. As for that act itself, it is an infidel act, and he deserves to be struck by the sword in a public place””and as soon as possible; as soon as possible; as soon as possible. It must be announced and photographed and disseminated among the people, so that all the people may know that we respect our Koran and its words from Allah, and whoever insults it, receives his punishment from Allah. If people like him are left alone, they will only get bolder and bolder.
.
The next guest, Sheikh Abdul Mohsin, said: “I support the words of Sheikh Mahmoud [who just spoke], that this man must be killed fast, that he may be an example to others, so that all learn that we have reached a new phase in respecting Islam and the holy sanctity of the Koran and Sunna. This man has become an apostate and must suffer the penalty in front of the people.”
The third and final guest, Dr. Abdullah, was somewhat critical of the first two Islamic scholars, not because they called for the man’s death, but because, by focusing on the fact that the man had apostatized, it seemed as if they were exonerating non-Muslims: “The issue of killing him is not limited to his being a Muslim and then apostatizing. No, it is known to us from the Sharia that whoever insults the Prophet or tears the Koran, his judgment is death, whether he’s a Muslim or non-Muslim.”
Later, a listener called in saying, “Just so you know, if I ever meet one of these people, their life is void, they’re simply dead.” The talk show host, who agreed that the man must be slain, responded with some moderate talk about letting the state handle such people, to which the first sheikh, Dr. Mahmoud Sha’ban, erupted in rage:
“Man, we’re talking about the religion of Allah! The religion! The religion!! The woman who insulted the Prophet, he voided her life! There were ten people at the conquest of Mecca whose lives the Prophet also voided!”’
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/09/raymond-ibrahim-muslim-clerics-kill-all-who-insult-islam