Posted on 05/15/2014 4:26:33 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
“Could be a mistake, but Issa wants answers from Lurch why.....” <<<-—the thing is, the answer to the question “why” is almost never useful, because behind that why is another why and another why and the line of questioning can *only* end up in a speculation as to someone’s motivation, which is inevitably an opinion. You/we are never ever going to see a memo that unequivocably states “we want to kill Chris Stevens because he knows about our plan to arm the Syrian rebels with surplus arms we already gave to Libya and either he succeeds or fails, but we can never let that information out.” There generally isn’t any item of tangible proof that can come from verbal (only) testimony that begins as an answer to the question “why”. And the more that Kerry is made to look like an idiot, which is no challenge, the more these hearings look like political theater to embarass the witnesses.
“Personally, Id rather let Mr. Gowdy handle all Benghazi matters.” <<<-—period, end of subject.
Please tell me that isn’t REALLY her last name.
“It will be nice seeing him on the other side of the table.
Pray America wakes up”
here’s the problem. if they hold hearings that show reprehensible behavior by this administration, and the media doesn’t report it, did it really happen?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.