Posted on 04/14/2014 11:30:47 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
You’re proven to be a troll. Head over to the Huffpost please.
already have when you made same assertion previously
Please site using the US Constitution, federal law, or treaty where the Congress permits adverse possession of federal lands.
Really? Your best argument is name calling?
Nope, that’s my worst argument.
You could start educating yourself with 28 USC.
My research comes up with the following:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/43/1068
Note the several limitations
- up to 160 acres
- that it is up to the Sec Interior’s discretion
- that it must start no later than Jan 1 1901
- must have paid taxes levied by the State
From what I have read, even if Bundy did file a claim of adverse possession, he would only gain at most 160 acres (not the 600,000) and even that would be in jepardy as it is unlikely that the State of Nevada has assessed taxes due on that land.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.