Posted on 04/12/2014 10:31:38 PM PDT by servo1969
>> super mojo shit on Bundys part
Straight.
Sounds like the way the Lord jammed Pharoah’s chariot wheels.
There’s been a lot of confusion issuing out of this conflict. Some people are claiming that Uncle Sam had the right to lease out the lands. Others are saying that’s a blasted lie or that discriminatory terms were applied to the Bundy situaion. Some kind of scoreboard pointing out who claimed what and why would ultimately be helpful. And why has Bundy had no luck in the courts — if he’s got lousy legal representation that ought to be fixed.
This was a weird little battle almost any way it could be put.
If they wanted to be ruthless they could. Ultimately it’s the stink they didn’t want, so weren’t ruthless. In a year that leads into some crucial elections that could wrest Congress completely out of Democrat hands, the Democrats understandably want to keep a nice face on.
Whether Bundys cattle were on public land is a separate issue but it provided a pretext to take property and business.
The issue is that a man was almost thrown off his property at gun point and dispossessed of his business at gun point so that another business may benefit.
Without exercising our inherent rights protected by the 2nd Amendment this legally conducted criminality would have succeeded.
Save
There was a court order, but there seems to be a deeper issue here if so... something like discriminatory terms.
“Stand your ground! Don’t fire unless fired upon but if it’s a war they want, let it begin here.” April 19, 1775
And again and again and again.
“nice and legal” but criminal. The feds twist the law to their advantage and ignore what is not to their advantage. We know this and let it happen.
So can we put our finger on what is unfair, and try to get it fixed?
Liberals at least try to do this, even though their ideas of what is unfair are sometimes, well, not fair.
start here http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3142972/posts?q=1&;page=81 and read to the end of thread
then go here http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3143026/posts?q=1&;page=301 and read to the end of thread
Still up for fools to see that it is all “lawful and tidy”.
I’m slightly color blind but the map shows areas where the impoundment notice applies? Is it the yellow grazing allotment land? The feds drove those cattle all the way from there to the interstate? Fools.
So what is all that yick-yack about?
"I was only following orders" is no longer a valid excuse.
Wouldn’t he make a great Nevada Senator?
Yes the colors are faint, due to transparency.
Gold Butte ACEC encompasses most of the Bunkerville allotment.
If you don’t want to read it STFU.
If you want to be indirect and misleading why don’t YOU stfu.
I mean, I am not into “going along with the crowd” even if the crowd is FR.
You want me to fall in with the crowd. That is NOT an answer. Spell out what is unfair.
I gave you the reference.
If your too lazy to read it and then call it “yick-yack” then you are ASS HOLE.
Who should be believed in all this yick-yack and who should not, and why?
Are you The Imperial Reference Of Record?
And if you are why did not you highlight just your own posts to that effect?
It started with YOUR listng a bunch of government reasons why they should have been able to do what they did. Where’s the debunking, and whose debunking is correct and whose is off the mark?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.