Skip to comments.
Should America Fight World War Three in Order to Defend Estonia?
Posted on 04/08/2014 8:57:52 AM PDT by ComtedeMaistre
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-174 last
To: ComtedeMaistre
“Do you believe that a couple of dozen nukes falling in American cities is a price worth paying, in order to defend teeny-weeny Estonia? Or should NATO limit itself to defending high value NATO nations?”
Wrong question.
The situation is, either fight now before the enemy is fully prepared, or fight later after the enemy is fully prepared.
We’ve been taught this lesson before. We will fail to learn this lesson now too. And we will pay a much more massive butchers’ bill later too. And we will still lose that fight in the long run, because the Cult of Cowardice so thoroughly dominates our society now, the nation can not even conceive of actually fighting a war to win it.
And, any who do not fully comprehend that the current issues stem directly from our refusal to functionally deal with recent issues, has his/her head so far up their exit that they’ve suffered brain damage from oxygen deprivation.
161
posted on
04/08/2014 3:05:25 PM PDT
by
Grimmy
(equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
To: Samogon
"...rusted-through ancient technology..."
You mean that technology that is the only way to put people on the ISS?
That one?
The one we don't have anymore?
To: ricmc2175
"With Russia, Bush wimped out..."
Not nearly as badly as Roosevelt did decades earlier.
To: CARTOUCHE
If RasPutin actually trusted and didnt need to verify the word of our President, he, Putin would know not to copulate with the USA or Estonia, Latvia, or Lithuania, Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, VietNam, Bhutan, or any other nation looking for a bed partner. That sure stopped him from copulating with the US when he went into Georgia back in 2008.
To: Cronos
For a sec thought it was Code Pink!
165
posted on
04/08/2014 4:15:48 PM PDT
by
QT3.14
(Obama Socialized Health Insurance Tax ( O S H I T ))
To: diogenes ghost
You sir are exactly correct, FDR and Wallace were Soviet dupes and Wallace was actually a Communist. Operation Snow drove a wedge between the US and Japan. One of the direct causes of WWII.
Comment #167 Removed by Moderator
To: ctdonath2
Winston Churchill said of Neville Chamberlain “He had a choice of dishonour or war. He chose dishonour. He shall have war”.
168
posted on
04/08/2014 6:07:38 PM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: ComtedeMaistre
No lets wait until it is Alaska.
To: ComtedeMaistre
Do you believe that a couple of dozen nukes falling in American cities is a price worth paying, in order to defend teeny-weeny Estonia? Or should NATO limit itself to defending high value NATO nations?
The time to ask this was when Estonia petitioned to join NATO. If we give up Estonia, they all the Baltics are fair game. So is Poland and Moldova and then Romania.... Moreover, asking this question no and pushing your position makes war more likely. You are a tool of Putin's Nazi retreadism and like the appeasers a handmaiden of a greater war. A united NATO and Europe prevents war. Weakness invites it. You and your kind will have blood on your hand. Stupidity is no excuse.
170
posted on
04/08/2014 10:10:57 PM PDT
by
rmlew
("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
To: DesertRhino
And then the Poles attacked that German Radio post on the border and started the war. Nutty move.
Are you a Nazi or a retard? The Poles attacked nothing. The SS attacked the facility, commited a false flag event, and murdered German ethnic Poles in the hope of convincing retards.
The Nazis had already mobilized and started their invasion within hours. The Soviets then invaded two weeks later as per their agreement. Sorry, you lose. And your Nazi propoganda is a sign of a mental illness or incapacity.
171
posted on
04/08/2014 10:14:14 PM PDT
by
rmlew
("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
To: DesertRhino
Do yourself a favor and look up "Operation Himmler" and the Gleiwitz incident aka Operation Canned Goods.
Why are you so desperate to believe Nazi propaganda? Is it because you feel a need to support the Eurasiaist KGB regime now? Is this a National Bolshevik thing?
172
posted on
04/08/2014 10:37:27 PM PDT
by
rmlew
("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
To: 1rudeboy
The satellite images released by NATO that allegedly show a current build-up of Russian troops near Ukrainian border were taken in August 2013 amid military drills, a source in the General Staff of the Russian Army has said. NATOs top military commander in Europe, General Philip Breedlove, on Wednesday claimed that there is evidence of what he says are 40,000 Russian troops on the border with Ukraine, tweeting a link to satellite images.
These shots, which were distributed by NATO, show Russian Armed Forces units of the Southern Military District, which in the summer of last year were taking part in various drills, including near the Ukrainian border, the General Staff official told RIA Novosti.
Who to believe - NATO or your own eyes?
173
posted on
04/11/2014 2:01:27 AM PDT
by
x_plus_one
(Islam Delenda Est)
To: ComtedeMaistre
No. We should opt for distributed deterrence (for those of you in Rio Linda, that means POTUS doesn't make the launch decision).
IOW, Estonia should go nuclear. They could if they wanted.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-174 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson