Skip to comments.
Six days and counting: The HHS Contraception Mandate gets its time in the Supreme Court
Hotair ^
| 03/19/2014
| Dustin Siggins
Posted on 03/19/2014 12:32:43 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: SeekAndFind
Win the case (I hope) and then kill it dead since Obamacare does not contain a severability clause.
2
posted on
03/19/2014 12:34:26 PM PDT
by
Colonel_Flagg
(Some people meet their heroes. I raised mine. Go Army.)
To: Colonel_Flagg
There used to be a time when I thought Justice Kennedy was the only wildcard with 4 being reliably for the original intent of the constitution and the other 4 reliably liberal.
Now, I’m afraid, there are two wildcards... Roberts being the other.
3
posted on
03/19/2014 12:38:29 PM PDT
by
SeekAndFind
(question is this)
To: SeekAndFind
I dread it but I think SCOTUS is in their pocket
4
posted on
03/19/2014 12:38:38 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
To: SeekAndFind
Liberalism is the new state church. They won the election and we lost, so we're supposed to just get over it, shut up and pay. Our religion takes an inferior position to theirs.
We should be grateful that they let us practice it at all. < / sarcasm >
5
posted on
03/19/2014 12:41:03 PM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: Colonel_Flagg
They have modified this turd, without legislation, numerous times with nary a peep from the loyal opposition (GOPe).
It all needs to be sent back for re-legislation. But it won’t. That would be racist/sexist.
6
posted on
03/19/2014 12:41:50 PM PDT
by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: GeronL
I dread it but I think SCOTUS is in their pocket
"You have a nice family there Your Honor. I'd hate to see anything happen to it."
7
posted on
03/19/2014 12:44:17 PM PDT
by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: Colonel_Flagg
Win the case (I hope) and then kill it dead since Obamacare does not contain a severability clause. No, sorry. The contraception mandate is not in the legislation. So it is not a matter of the legislation being found unconstitutional.
This is about a regulation. Regulations can be changed.
To: SeekAndFind
Will Elena Kagan be able to participate? After all, she WAS solicitor general while a lot of similar turmoil was ongoing.
9
posted on
03/19/2014 12:49:19 PM PDT
by
Rembrandt
(Part of the 51% who pay Federal taxes)
To: SeekAndFind
And will they need, what?, 2 years to come to an opinion?
10
posted on
03/19/2014 12:49:47 PM PDT
by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: fwdude
RE: And will they need, what?, 2 years to come to an opinion?
The decision on the individual mandate didn’t take that long. If I remember correctly, just a few days after oral arguments.
11
posted on
03/19/2014 12:51:10 PM PDT
by
SeekAndFind
(question is this)
To: GeronL
I dread it but I think SCOTUS is in their pocket Both Roberts and Kennedy have some serious dirt that works as good leverage for the Marxists.
12
posted on
03/19/2014 12:51:36 PM PDT
by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: SeekAndFind
I don’t think these things are ever decided in a few days. Months at the shortest.
13
posted on
03/19/2014 12:52:32 PM PDT
by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: SoothingDave
Obama thinks he can change anything he wants with the stroke of a pen. Which is one of the most annoying things about him. I stand corrected.
14
posted on
03/19/2014 1:01:15 PM PDT
by
Colonel_Flagg
(Some people meet their heroes. I raised mine. Go Army.)
To: fwdude; SeekAndFind
Most decisions are announced in May and June (July if needed), corresponding with the end of the SCOTUS term.
15
posted on
03/19/2014 1:05:45 PM PDT
by
C210N
(When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
To: SeekAndFind
Only Scalia and Thomas believe in the Constitution of limited and enumerated powers anymore. The rest are adherents of the unhindered and unencumbered administrative state that does what it likes when it likes.
And they will prove it again here.
16
posted on
03/19/2014 1:16:23 PM PDT
by
mojito
(Zero, our Nero.)
To: fwdude
Question! What is the serious dirt you have on Roberts and Kennedy?
To: mojito
RE: Only Scalia and Thomas believe in the Constitution of limited and enumerated powers anymore.
What about Sam Alito?
18
posted on
03/19/2014 2:34:36 PM PDT
by
SeekAndFind
(question is this)
To: noinfringers2
Well, on Roberts, rumor has it that his adopted child is not properly a citizen, and is subject to deportation.
Kennedy is just a closet homosexual.
19
posted on
03/19/2014 2:36:36 PM PDT
by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: SeekAndFind
Don’t worry, Chief Justice Roberts will figure out some way to call the mandate a “tax” and thus “constitutional”.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson