Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Cult of Global Warming is Grasping at Straws
Townhall.com ^ | January 10, 2014 | Michael Schaus

Posted on 01/10/2014 1:25:00 PM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: BCW
People, we need to do a better job of vetting hanging these politicians - making it known what we find out - and not counting on the PRESS or GOVT for answers!

FIXED!

21 posted on 01/10/2014 8:20:19 PM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51

“...theoretical physicist Lee Smolin argues that fundamental physics — the search for the laws of nature — losing its way. Ambitious ideas about extra dimensions, exotic particles, multiple universes,...”

I talked with him for about 30 minutes several years ago about his idea that there were multiple universes that evolved and that this would explain a universe seemingly designed for humans. Basically, the idea was that black holes are the birth place of new universes and that they pass their fundamental constants on to the baby universe. However, the constants can be slightly modified during the transition. Since stars make black holes, he argued that the “multiverse” (my word not his) selects for universes that produce a lot of stars because they will have a lot of baby universes. To have a lot of stars requires fundamental constants as in our universe. QED.

Of course it’s like life. You have to get to the first self-replicating molecule for evolution to start working. In universes, you’d have to get to the universe that has the first star.

It sounds like his thinking has evolved since then.


22 posted on 01/10/2014 9:46:45 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Climatology is to meteorology what astrology is to astronomy.


23 posted on 01/11/2014 1:05:48 AM PST by Avogadros Number
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Avogadros Number
"This was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow,and our planet began to heal.

Welcome King Barack "Canute" Obama the Great.....

...Obama issues an Executive Order to the Sun...

....to increase it's magnetic field....

and make a good crop of sunspots before elections in 2016....

(PhysOrg.com) -- Sunspot formation is triggered by a magnetic field, which scientists say is steadily declining. They predict that by 2016 there may be no remaining sunspots, and the sun may stay spotless for several decades.

The last time the sunspots disappeared altogether was in the 17th and 18th century, and coincided with a lengthy cool period on the planet known as the Little Ice Age....and lasted 400 years.

Good luck surviving with no electricity and GE modified seeds.

Read more at: http://phys.org/news203746768.html#jCp

24 posted on 01/11/2014 6:58:45 AM PST by spokeshave (OMG.......Schadenfreude overload is not covered under Obamacare :-()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker
That's very cool that you had a chance to talk with him. I'm sure it was an interesting experience.

The book is more a critique on theoretical physics community with regard to string theory, and less about his own work.

After reading the book, my first big takeaway is that string theory is really not one theory, but an overarching set of theories, some contradictory to each other and to the background independent space-time models. Also, none of these theories can be falsified, since there are so many variables that can be "tuned" to meet the outcomes of any test.

The second is that string theory is such a predominate force in the theoretical physics community that it shuts out funding for other competing theories, such as his loop quantum gravity theory.

I do remember him discussing the evolving multiverse stuff in his book, but that is only a short section of the total. I would highly recommend the book, and if you read it, I would be interested in what you think about it.

Regards,
K51

25 posted on 01/11/2014 11:31:34 AM PST by kosciusko51 (Enough of "Who is John Galt?" Who is Patrick Henry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson