Posted on 10/22/2013 7:17:58 PM PDT by John S Mosby
Remember, John Brennan was running that security firm before Obama got elected, and now he is the CIA director. Payoffs all around, it would seem.
yep. just didn’t know they misspelled the fake rank first name. Lots like that in aa society.... like Major Owens, or General Washington Jones (that kind of thing).
No way of knowing about Harris. He was a material witness in the investigation, as a street punk with some damning information/connection to the cut-outs or the Analysis employee.
This kind of connectivity is not “conspiracy theory” country if “qui bono” leads to the continuing sanitation of king obongo and the payback for doing it through a no-bid contract with CGI.
This is a real find.
“Lieutenant Quarles Harris was a witness in the breach investigation because Metro Police caught him with credit and passport info he had on him, which he got from apparently one of the 3 employees”
You’re incorrect on this point. He was not a witness in the breach investigation. He was involved in an entirely separate case of identity theft involving an accomplice inside the State department, and nothing has ever been found to connect that case to the breach case. It just happened to be mentioned at the end of a single article on the breach case, and people have conflated the two ever since. The paper issued a clarification in the very next story about the case, to no avail.
As his candidacy progressed it is possible the Saudis wanted leverage insurance over Obama in case as Prezhe got uppity and proved less amenable to their preferences, ergo his Pakistani and/or travel records.
Would type much more but I’m on my phone typing with just two fingers.
1. Brennan steals obama’s travel records
2. Obama selects Brennan as Director of CIA
Normal...??? Ehhhh.......NO.
Smells sorta like BLACKMAIL.
Don’t forget to read the follow up article that clarifies that case was unrelated to the Obama/McCain/Clinton passport breach case:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/nov/01/security-breach-threatens-passport-applicants/
“No way of knowing about Harris.”
Sure there is. Read the follow-up article that gives more details on his case and explains that it wasn’t related to the other passport breach:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/nov/01/security-breach-threatens-passport-applicants/
Explains it more or less. A loose end that was cleaned up, in
“the hood”. No doubt he was street punk, but does not mean he could not have been in contact with the cut-outs who sanitized obamaumaos file. The whole thing providing a “criminal ring” cover for the hole plugging (kill).
Or, it was just another night in tonton macoute land knife and gun club of DC. But it wouldn’t be the first time, anywhere the company covers an op with street crime.
“1. Brennan steals obamas travel records”
Can’t be done. They’re are offsite backup records. Obama is a naturalized citizen. He’s ineligible.
Investigation of both incidents finds common digital forensic factors that suggest that the same person or persons involved in the 2008 passport office break-in (or at least the same entities) might be involved in the dissemination of the video Innocence of Muslims immediately following the 2012 attacks in Benghazi. Or, it would appear that way.
It is the professional opinion of this author, holding certification in Internet Profiling, that both incidents, despite this four-year span, appear to involve companies associated with corporate entities serving, or otherwise connected to, the U.S. government. This was determined through analysis of the IP addresses used to upload and change certain characteristics of the video, among other investigative indications.
Based on this research and investigation, the one person identified as seeming to have some level of involvement in the midst of both incidents is John O. Brennan.
From page 2
http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/PDF/Brennanf2.pdf
Well, surprise surprise...
“No doubt he was street punk, but does not mean he could not have been in contact with the cut-outs who sanitized obamaumaos file.”
No, I’m sorry, that is not how logic works. I could say “there is no reason John S Mosby could not have been in contact with people involved in the passport breach”, and it would be just as logical, since I would have exactly the same amount of evidence to back my statement: zero.
Is healthcare.gov a smoke screen for CGI gun registry built in Canada?
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/58745
We aren’t talking logic— talking operational. Extra legal, you know, not a court case— sub rosa. Counterintel is trained this way.
Yes, you’re obviously not talking logic, that is certain.
Well duh makes perfect sense, call them back up on the speed dial, they did a great job about the passports why not reward them with a socialized agenda to instill Communism through promises of free health care?
Ok Mr. Spock... you’re right— always. Couldn’t be anything else. The world is a rational logical place and logic explains all. Comfort in the box. Stay there.
“The world is a rational logical place and logic explains all.”
It’s not that logic explains all, it’s just that you will get nowhere if you form opinions based on no logic at all. Might as well accuse Ronald McDonald of being involved, if we are not going to rely on logic and evidence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.