Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Graham + The Machine (Lindsey Graham is no longer the "lesser of two evils"
fitsnews.com ^ | 10/17/13

Posted on 10/19/2013 5:54:38 AM PDT by cotton1706

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: maryz
Are the other two challengers genuine conservative candidates? I only ask because, here in Massachusetts, I suspect that on the rare occasions a real conservative announces, the MA GOP recruits a liberal to run in the primary and perhaps a self-styled "conservative" with no political record to split the conservative vote.

SC has a runoff primary, not a so-called "first over the finish line". In such a case it's better to have many candidates. The strategy is to draw off enough votes from Graham to hold him under 50%. That forces him into a runoff against the leading challenger. That is the path that Cruz took in TX against Dewhurst. In the first vote Dewhurst outpolled Cruz substantially but, then, in the runoff, with the also-rans removed, Dewhurst couldn't stand up to the direct comparison against Cruz.

41 posted on 10/19/2013 7:45:34 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Is John's moustache long enough YET?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

If Graham wins the primary, hopefully conservatively minded Republicans will refrain from voting in the general election or support a third party candidate or even vote for the Democratic candidate. Graham is worse than a traitor to majority of those who voted for him in the past.


42 posted on 10/19/2013 7:47:05 AM PDT by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bfh333

The Democrat against Lindsey in 2008 was more conservative than Lindsey, but SC sticks with Loveable Lindsey. It’s all the poor folk there know to do.


43 posted on 10/19/2013 7:52:01 AM PDT by Theodore R. (The grand pooh-bahs have spoken: "It's Jebbie's turn!" to LOSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

He should be told, in no uncertain terms, that if he runs as anything other than a republican and wins, he won’t be caucusing with the republicans. Let him go sit in on the Dems - they won’t trust him, and his power will be gone. The republican party leaders need to begin to punish those that seek to go around the party for their election.


44 posted on 10/19/2013 8:12:08 AM PDT by krogers58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

He should be told, in no uncertain terms, that if he runs as anything other than a republican and wins, he won’t be caucusing with the republicans. Let him go sit in on the Dems - they won’t trust him, and his power will be gone. The republican party leaders need to begin to punish those that seek to go around the party for their election.


45 posted on 10/19/2013 8:12:16 AM PDT by krogers58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

That’s reassuring — thanks!


46 posted on 10/19/2013 8:14:17 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson