Posted on 09/20/2013 4:29:03 AM PDT by spirited irish
My views on this are entirely consistent with those of most Christian denominations.
***Your views are so far out of the mainstream of christian denominations that they are simply heretical. You are a heretic.
My views on this are entirely consistent with those of most Christian denominations.
***Your views are so far out of the mainstream of christian denominations that they are simply heretical. You are a heretic.
That’s why I continue to request that you treat those views with forbearance and respect.
***Such a thing is too much to ask from God Himself, clad in human flesh. Jesus called false teachers like you ‘sons of satan’ but you would ask FReepers for their forbearance and respect. You ask more of FReepers than God expected of Himself. You are properly labelled a God damned heretic.
I am here to ask you to show them forbearance and respect.
***Such a thing is too much to ask from God Himself, clad in human flesh. Jesus called false teachers like you ‘sons of satan’ but you would ask FReepers for their forbearance and respect. You ask more of FReepers than God expected of Himself. You are properly labelled a God damned heretic.
And yet Kevmo’s charge of “God Damned Heretic” and spirited irish’s application of “Damnable Heresy” to opinions expressed by yours truly, BroJoeK — those are not Alinsky tactics??
***You would accuse Christ of engaging in Alinsky tactics because he properly condemns false teachers like yourself as ‘sons of satan’. But you would ask FReepers for their forbearance and respect. You ask more of FReepers than God expected of Himself. You are properly labelled a God damned heretic.
On top of that you’re too slow to realize that a simple application of Occham’s Razor and Pascal’s Wager would show that the right thing for you to do is to stop posting your stuff on FR. You say that our position is valid. We say that your position is invalid; so invalid, that it qualifies as a damnable heresy.
only to request your forbearance and respect for those... who saw things differently.
***Such a thing is too much to ask from God Himself, clad in human flesh. Jesus called false teachers like you ‘sons of satan’ but you would ask FReepers for their forbearance and respect. You ask more of FReepers than God expected of Himself. You are properly labelled a God damned heretic.
I am here representing and defending — to the best of my abilities — the religious views of our Founders, and others similar.
***You are here representing and defending your own heretical views.
The new testament is plenty clear to 95% of christians who don’t play games with the trinity. It’s only obscure when heretics like you twist scripture and history in furtherance of their ideology.
That’s a bunch of horse manure. Even these heretics acknowledge that the vast majority of christians are trinitarian.
If we treat those expressing anti-Christ theology with respect, then we become the enemy of Christ. So, you will never receive respect from us.
Amen!
“Heresy” is simply a nasty way of saying “un-orthodox”.
Compare: the “N-word” versus “African American”.
***Then accept the label as properly applied to you. Christ Himself called false teachers of His day “sons of satan”, so it’s easier to accept being called a heretic than a satanist.
Broadly speaking distinctions between “orthodox” and “un-orthodox” are well known.
***You acknowledge your beliefs are “un-orthodox”, which is another word for “heresy”.
People who today call themselves “restorationists” are clearly un-orthodox.
***And just as clearly, heretical.
Hereis an article I doubt you will want to read. http://carm.org/christianity/christian-doctrine/col-29-and-eph-319
One must be careful and avoid Imethinkitus, when dealing with God's Word.
The heresy razor.
What is said about one’s belief
they say-————— about our beliefs -——— about their
beliefs
we say-—————— about our beliefs -——— about their
beliefs
antitrinitarians say —valid; acceptable -——— Valid; The only True interpretation
“Trinitarians say -— Valid, correct, “only True”-— Invalid, heretical
***Basically, there is only one case where their viewpoint is true and they cannot even defend it here on FR.
Like Pascal’s wager, 3 cases Valid. One case Invalid. And to be candid, that one case is spiritually ugly.
Nobody ever said dogma had to be pretty.
You mad, bro?
I’m done with your stalking
GLAT
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3069049/posts?page=2832#2832
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.