Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Falling Stars, Damnable Heresy, and the Spirit of Evolution
Renew America ^ | Sept. 19, 2013 | Linda Kimball

Posted on 09/20/2013 4:29:03 AM PDT by spirited irish

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,501-1,5201,521-1,5401,541-1,560 ... 2,961-2,967 next last
To: Alamo-Girl; BroJoeK; spirited irish; YHAOS; hosepipe; tacticalogic; metmom; MHGinTN; marron
You say the first principle of science is "natural explanations for natural processes" but if that were the case then science would have no currency for things not strictly natural. That would exclude much of information theory and other areas of mathematics in relation to science....

I prefer Popper's "first principle" to BroJoeK's, in part for the reasons you cite, dearest sister in Christ.

BroJoeK's "first principle" — "natural explanations for natural processes" — rather stacks the deck in favor of finding "natural explanations" only. We tend to find what we are looking for, and screen out anything irrelevant to that purpose.

Thank you so very much for your astute observations, dearest sister in Christ!

1,521 posted on 12/11/2013 3:07:20 PM PST by betty boop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1497 | View Replies]

To: YHAOS; BroJoeK; spirited irish; Alamo-Girl; MHGinTN; hosepipe; metmom; marron; tacticalogic
Outstanding essay/post, dear YHAOS! Thank you ever so much, dear brother in Christ!
1,522 posted on 12/11/2013 3:09:20 PM PST by betty boop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1519 | View Replies]

To: spirited irish; Alamo-Girl
Molnar was not characterizing Plato as a Gnostic thinker, for he was no such thing, but rather demonstrating common points of departure between ancient pantheist nature religions and modern Gnostic movements

Thanks so much, dear sister in Christ, for clearing that up! I didn't get the context of your statement, and so read it wrongly.

Hermes Trismegistus is a real puzzle for me — there is still some doubt that such a figure ever really existed. If he didn't, then who wrote his stuff???

Further, at the period in which he allegedly existed, "esoteric material" like his was generally conveyed by oral tradition. The Pythagorean school, for instance — which evidently taught that the very basis of the cosmos could be found in number and geometry — absolutely forbade putting the teachings into written form. Violators were subject to capitol punishment — as at least one poor soul found out the hard way. He said he was only "taking notes" to help his subsequent meditations on the teachings of the school. Whereupon he was sewn into a calf skin and thrown into a raging river, and promptly drowned.

Most esoteric schools were very alert to the "casting pearls before swine" problem. Thus their reliance on oral transmission only, and then only to those "adepts" who had qualified themselves as worthy of receiving the teachings, largely based on the soundness of their moral character and the quality of their reasoning abilities.

So if Hermes Trismegistus wrote stuff down, he must have been trying to reach the masses, for whatever reason. Certainly if he wrote, he was not terribly concerned about the "pearls before swine" problem....

I love Orwell. He really nails it....

Thank you so very much, dear spirited, for your fine essay/post!

1,523 posted on 12/11/2013 3:29:10 PM PST by betty boop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1501 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

Thank you so much for your kind words, dearest sister in Christ!


1,524 posted on 12/11/2013 3:30:17 PM PST by betty boop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1517 | View Replies]

To: betty boop
BroJoeK's "first principle" — "natural explanations for natural processes" — rather stacks the deck in favor of finding "natural explanations" only. We tend to find what we are looking for, and screen out anything irrelevant to that purpose.

Are we really looking to "unstack" the deck, or just struggling for control over who gets to stack it? Is "not allowing a divine foot in the door" any less stacked than allowing only one specific "divine foot" while disallowing any others?

1,525 posted on 12/11/2013 3:56:57 PM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1521 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK; spirited irish; Alamo-Girl; MHGinTN; hosepipe; metmom; marron; tacticalogic
I don't expect “science” to prove anything about God at all. Certainly, I don't need it to.

Which word didn’t you understand?

1,526 posted on 12/11/2013 6:21:11 PM PST by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1491 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK; spirited irish; Alamo-Girl; MHGinTN; hosepipe; metmom; marron; tacticalogic
I question if your assault on Gnostics is also an assault on our Founders, and therefore also an attack on our Founding principles?.

What lead you to that misbegotten notion? Which word didn’t you understand?

1,527 posted on 12/11/2013 6:23:25 PM PST by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1502 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK; spirited irish; Alamo-Girl; MHGinTN; hosepipe; metmom; marron; tacticalogic
To boop: “if you fantasize that natural-science somehow can include super-natural explanations, or even explanations of the super-natural, then I would challenge you to find some official dictionary which says that explicitly.

What lead you to that misbegotten notion? Which word didn’t you understand?

1,528 posted on 12/11/2013 6:25:29 PM PST by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1504 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK; spirited irish; Alamo-Girl; MHGinTN; hosepipe; metmom; marron; tacticalogic
To spirited irish: “Perhaps you can appreciate that I interpret your assault on Paine as an attack on his biggest admirers, including young Abraham Lincoln.

What lead you to that misbegotten notion? Which word didn’t you understand?

1,529 posted on 12/11/2013 6:27:59 PM PST by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1506 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic; spirited irish; Alamo-Girl; betty boop; hosepipe; metmom; marron; BroJoeK
Are we really looking to “unstack” the deck, or just struggling for control over who gets to stack it?

What “we” is this, Pilgrim? Are you “looking to unstack the deck,” or “or just struggling for control over who gets to stack it?”

1,530 posted on 12/11/2013 7:17:37 PM PST by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1525 | View Replies]

To: YHAOS

Thank you so much for sharing your insights, dear YHAOS!


1,531 posted on 12/11/2013 7:22:47 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1519 | View Replies]

To: betty boop
We tend to find what we are looking for...

So very true, dearest sister in Christ!
1,532 posted on 12/11/2013 7:24:02 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1521 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
Likewise, A-G.
1,533 posted on 12/11/2013 7:50:52 PM PST by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1531 | View Replies]

To: YHAOS

That hit a nerve, didn’t it?


1,534 posted on 12/11/2013 7:53:02 PM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1530 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
"That hit a nerve, didn’t it?"

Get over yourself.

1,535 posted on 12/11/2013 8:14:06 PM PST by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1534 | View Replies]

To: YHAOS
Get over yourself.

You figure if you put me on the defensive, nobody will notice that question never gets answered?

1,536 posted on 12/11/2013 8:16:00 PM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1535 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
"You figure if you put me on the defensive, nobody will notice that question never gets answered?"

Projection. Do not assume everyone's thought processes are identical to your own. Standing off at a distance and peppering the assembly with spitwads is a miserable existence. Give it up.

1,537 posted on 12/11/2013 8:30:21 PM PST by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1536 | View Replies]

To: YHAOS
Give it up.

I bet you'd like that. You get to sit there and declare your own religous beliefs the one true faith, and everyone else has to agree with you or STFU.

1,538 posted on 12/12/2013 3:21:55 AM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1537 | View Replies]

To: YHAOS; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; MHGinTN; hosepipe; metmom; marron; tacticalogic; BroJoeK

To boop: “if you fantasize that natural-science somehow can include super-natural explanations, or even explanations of the super-natural, then I would challenge you to find some official dictionary which says that explicitly.”

Spirited: To paraphrase Kierkegaard, natural science (as opposed to science in search of truth and reality) is the ‘science’ of Tolkien’s Gollum. Gollum is the quintessential ‘blood and soil’ being in search of power here below. His soul is materialized, or as the prophet Jeremiah put it, his soul/spirit is a cistern without living water. To spiritually-dark Gollum, the supernatural is nonsense.


1,539 posted on 12/12/2013 3:22:56 AM PST by spirited irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1528 | View Replies]

To: spirited irish

Interesting way to approach this ... in times past, the Jews who practiced their religion while traveling would carry a plumb-bob, to determine if the water they wanted to use in ritual washing was moving or not (alive or sedentary).


1,540 posted on 12/12/2013 8:59:37 AM PST by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1539 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,501-1,5201,521-1,5401,541-1,560 ... 2,961-2,967 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson