Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/06/2013 6:51:23 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: maggief

Visualize whirrled peas


135 posted on 09/06/2013 7:45:46 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Henceforth, the Office of the President shall be known as IMPOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

Now Putin is drawing the line. Obama better listen.


141 posted on 09/06/2013 7:57:07 AM PDT by Rapscallion (Vlad the Impaler proposed no path to citizenhip. Consider that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

Video of Maaloula .
A resident of the town speaks at 3:06 of some of the atrocities the rebels that obama wants to side on.

http://youtu.be/FSkNruTAtyQ

Maaloula, tucked into the honey-coloured cliffs of a mountain range north of Damascus and on a “tentative” list of applicants for Unesco world heritage status, is associated with the earliest days of Christianity.

St Thecla, who is supposedly buried in the convent, was a follower of St Paul who fled to the village in Syria to avoid marriage, having taken an oath of chastity. It is said that the cleft of rock in which the convent is placed opened up to allow her to escape her pursuers.

The inhabitants are mostly Melkite Greek Catholic and Orthodox Christians, but have historically lived peacefully alongside a Sunni Muslim minority. It is one of only three places in the world where Western Aramaic, a dialect of the language spoken by Christ, is still used. -
See more at: http://www.weaselzippers.net/#sthash.VCivHvcx.dpuf


149 posted on 09/06/2013 8:07:32 AM PDT by sunny48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

150 posted on 09/06/2013 8:07:46 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (IÂ’m not a Republican, I'm a Conservative! Pubbies haven't been conservative since before T.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

Putin is playing a game of bet ya won’t knock this block of my shoulder.
And the weenie obammy understands he is in over his head.
The punk


153 posted on 09/06/2013 8:15:25 AM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) ( Hey Rubio, eat pooh pal))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

You realize that RT is a propaganda organ funded by the Russian government and founded by Vlad’s press secretary.


156 posted on 09/06/2013 8:16:52 AM PDT by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

I suspect Russian troops will be arriving in Syria en masse before too long.

Then what, Barry?

Oops, didn’t think about that, did you?


157 posted on 09/06/2013 8:17:10 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

Not to worry. Obama’s homo brigades will volunteer to fight Putin’s army.


178 posted on 09/06/2013 8:47:56 AM PDT by raybbr (I weep over my sons' future in this Godforsaken country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

Community Organizers don’t make good leaders. This confrontation needs to be put off until the U.S. has a REAL Commander-in-Chief.


189 posted on 09/06/2013 9:02:24 AM PDT by Amish with an attitude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

Well, that’s settled. Obama won’t be attacking Syria now.

And he has “Those Obstructionist Republicans in Congress!”, and “Those Obstructionist Russians in the U.N.!” to blame.


192 posted on 09/06/2013 9:09:39 AM PDT by tcrlaf (Well, it is what the Sheeple voted for....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

So will Obama demand women be drafted for his world war?


215 posted on 09/06/2013 9:48:55 AM PDT by Phillyred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

New Cold War starting all over again.. and sadly, in my opinion, we are on the wrong side :/


218 posted on 09/06/2013 9:52:39 AM PDT by Bikkuri (Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

The Russians will have the following warships/combatants in the Eastern Mediterranean capable of engaging the US/French vessels there:

1 x Slava Cruiser CG
2 x Udaloy Destroyers
1 x Neustrminy Frigate DDGs
1 x Kravak Firgate FFG
2 x Nuclear Submarines (possible) SSNs

That’s seven vessels capable of modern engagements.

The US and France will have the following in the area:

1 x Charles de Gaulle nuclear carrier CVN
1 x French Horizon Class anti-air destroyer DDG
5 x US Burke Class AEGIS destroyers DDG
1 x Geroge Lyenus DDG
1 x FREMM FFG
1 x Lafayette DDG
1 x Rubis nulcear attack submarine SSN
2 x US Nuclear attack submarines (possible) SSN
1 x Ohio Class guided missile sub SSGN (Possible)

That’s 14 vessels very capable vessels and their aircraft.

In addition, the Italians have two destroyers and a firgate in the area and the UK has a destroyer, two frigate and perhaps another nuclear attack submarine in the area. Even though they will not take part in the Syrian attack, if it came down to fighting with Russia, because of the NATO alliance, those vessels would help the US/French. That adds another seven vessels.

In fact, one of the destroyers, the frigates and sub are already conducting rigorous anti-submarine “exercises” in the area.

The US has a major air base in Italy and major bases in Kuwait and Bahrain. The US also has two complete nuclear carrier battle groups with a total of 2 nuclear carriers and their aircraft, 2 cruisers, 6 destroyers and 2 nuclear attack submarines in the Red Sae and the Arabian Sea. That’s another 12 very capable vessels and a LOT of aircraft.

The Russian forces in the area will not enage these forces, or militarily try and shoot down their missiles and thus make themselves military targets, unless something else very bad happens above and beyond the Tomahawk missile strikes aimed at Syria.

The talk to the contrary ois:

1) Rhetoric and bluster.
2) Potentially aimed at letting the US know that it is going to give new weapons to the Syrains to help them “resist.” But that is a dangerous game because that vessel has not left the Black Sea yet and if it ventures in with combat weapons for the Syrians during the attack, it will make it self a target, and at the very least make the dock a target where they attempt to offload the weapons.

And even if they did successfully offlaod them, the Syrians will be weeks (if not months) in intergrating them into their own defenses...so they would do little good in the current strike.

Now, I hope the US House vote downs this “strike.” it is senseless and is purely political on the part of an abjectly failed administration. There are no US interests that will be positively effected by the proposed strike. There is only down side.


231 posted on 09/06/2013 10:15:26 AM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

After we bomb Syria lets show um we’re the big global cop on the block and bomb North Korea too!

U.S.Global Police Department....


232 posted on 09/06/2013 10:20:03 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief
Although Russia's strident opposition to our involvement in Syria is not a sufficient reason, per se, for the US to back away--if it were clearly in our national interest to back the Syrian rebels, I would advocate our doing so, irrespective of Putin's overheated rhetoric--I am not at all certain that this is a wise move for America.

And if we really were to become involved in a wider war in the Middle East--perhaps even WWIII, as some have suggested--it begs the question: Is our current Commander-in-Chief up to the task of spearheading such an enormous conflict? (It seems like an especially pertinent question, given the degree to which he has already hollowed out the American military.)

235 posted on 09/06/2013 10:24:52 AM PDT by AmericanExceptionalist (Democrats believe in discussing the full spectrum of ideas, all the way from far left to center-left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief
You have to ask yourself...what would our "government" do if AQ terrorists started slaughtering people in the streets in this country? What side would this admin be on? Hmmmm

These jerks just use any group that will curry them favor, they do not care about deaths unless they can use them to mobilize the living for their own personal advantage...period. They really do not care if WWIII starts as long as they have a security net ready for themselves.

236 posted on 09/06/2013 10:24:53 AM PDT by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......? Embrace a ruler today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief; All

I was reading this thread and stared thinking....always dangerous.

(BTW....what follows is not meant as a thread hijack, just my thoughts about what I’m seeing. If you view this as a hijack, I do apologize. That having been said....)

I can just see Obama and his over-stuffed ego wanting to ‘make a statement’ that he is one who ‘doesn’t back down’ from what he wants. Now that Russia has said just what they’re going to do if Syria is attacked, I can imagine that our no-nothing, “I’m doing it MY way” (p)res__ent will ignore the blatant warning he just got and attempt an attack on Syria anyway.

Biblical scholars have often wondered why the United States isn’t ever mentioned in end-times prophecy. I offer this:

Could it be that the reason we’re not mentioned is that the US DOES NOT EXIST in that time because we’ve been blown off the map in a thermonuclear war?

Given our nation’s increasing proclivity for embracing evil (abortion, divorce, gay marriage, sexual promiscuity, etc. ad nauseum), might it not be that God’s justice might be shown by causing the utter destruction of the United States?
I am by NO means saying that I want this. I’d like to die peacefully, old and full of years , not trembling in terror as inbound Russian ballistic missiles are about to vaporize myself and my family. I AM saying that this may be a possibility. Remote, but it’s there.


247 posted on 09/06/2013 10:50:47 AM PDT by hoagy62 ("Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered..."-Thomas Paine. 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

Now what Obozo?


261 posted on 09/06/2013 11:11:59 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

Putty’s just trying to face down Bathhouse Barry.

It’s undoubtedly working.


265 posted on 09/06/2013 11:18:50 AM PDT by mojito (Zero, our Nero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

282 posted on 09/06/2013 2:26:23 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I aim to raise a million plus for Gov. Palin. What'll you do?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson