Many in U.S. Army are secret members of Anonymous; more leaks are coming

DC Clothesline ^ | 8/15/13 | Dr. Eowyn

[null and void]

Who can obama really trust?

[null and void]

CWII is coming. Choose a mask…

Hint: Sheep get sheared, slaughtered and eaten.

Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping!

To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping List you must threaten to report me to the Mods if I don’t add you to the list...

[mylife]

Not smart to take an oath and then use your access to break the oath.

[svcw]

What more angry homosexuals?

[MeganC]

“Not smart to take an oath and then use your access to break the oath.”

Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg could attest to that.

[DuncanWaring]

A Guy Fawkes mask on the dashboard is just one way this Army captain tips off other soldiers that he’s a fellow member of Anonymous.

Sounds imprudent from an OpSec perspective.

[DuncanWaring]

Actually, Col. von Stauffenberg would attest that if you’re doing something important, you need to stick around until it’s complete.

[mylife]

Lots of people “could”

[wbill]

yup. Either the interviewer was getting played, or the interviewee was pretending to be a whole lot more important than they were. Or both.

[Gay State Conservative]

In '69 part of the process of joining the Army (and the other branches too,no doubt) was filling out stacks of forms/questionnaires.One that I recall had a list of a couple of hundred organizations and you were asked if you ever belonged to any of them.Groups like the Communist Party,Hands Off North Korea,Fair Treatment For Cuba,etc.

Now we have an organized sub culture of Marxist subversives in the military.Or so it's claimed.Un-bleepin-belivable.

[null and void]

What happens if you take an oath to "Protect the Constitution against ALL enemies foreign and DOMESTIC" and find out your command structure is behaving in a contra-constitutional manner utterly indistinguishable from that of a sworn enemy?

Do you follow your oath, or your orders?

Legal precedent, Nuremberg:

"I vas yust vollowink orders" didn't save anyone from blame, trial, culpability, or hanging.

[wbill]

(continued)... "Yeah! I've got secrets. big BIG secrets. But I can't tell you, because, well, they're secret. But trust me, they're big!"

This guy was stroking his own ego.

[mylife]

You know the answer.

[MaxMax]

This crap needs to stop or we should BRING BACK THE FIRING SQUAD and
put any traitors to death! Just dammit.

[MeganC]

I think Mr. Snowden accomplished more by keeping his story in the media for weeks on end as opposed to surrendering to some clandestine agency that’d just lock him away without trial.

[Crazieman]

Actually, Anonymous isn’t very lockstep at all. The two primary factions that loosely work together for the sake of computer ability, are both marxists and libertarian types.

This sparks a lot of in-fighting on certain politically charged hacking targets.

[mylife]

Agreed.

[null and void]

Yes I do. But based on your post #3, it may not be the same answer you’d give.

[null and void]

Which traitors?

The ones suspending and violating the Constitution, or the ones exposing them?

[Utilizer]

Not smart to take an oath and then use your access to break the oath.

Shhh! Easy, then. You can't insinuate anything about Big Rachel's supporter, The Annointed One! He's been getting away with it for over five years, and I'm taking a WAG here that he will never announce that you look "just like" his son...