Posted on 07/30/2013 9:03:55 AM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
Stan’s other half-sister, Virginia, supplied the media with most of the questionable family photos as well as some of the very questionable tales that go with them. Who supplied her with the photos? Not know, but since most seemed photoshopped, I could hazard a guess.
Aunt Eleanor didn’t have to be involved in any political drama, if her role took place decades ago, when maybe all she did was to provide shelter for a young relative who was in a very unfortunate (for the time) circumstance.
The photo on the far left: Explain how Zero’s head is SO SMALL and yet grows to normal size in the photo on the right.
Except that SAD is not his mother....
Good point!
That article was scrubbed almost as fast as a snowflake melts, and replaced with another. After that, a video came out showing the Goeldners surrounded by photographs of their Hawaii relatives and lots and lots of images of zero...
Obviously, the Goeldners didn't know about Stanley Ann having a baby, because THEY WOULD HAVE KNOWN STANLEY ANN DUNHAM DIDN'T DIE IN 1970.
Virginia Goeldner with Stanley Armour Dunham in Hawaii in 1982.
That is odd.
Who pretended that she was in a very unfortunate circumstance...
I remember vividly when that was discussed.
Everyone know that SAD was not his mother, except those who were supposed to be the dupes. They all knew, and gazillions of them know now, too. That’s one reason for their nastiness - people are always nasty when they dupe others, they consider those they dupe to be stupid fools.
“Do you have a link where the WA transcript was debunked?”
IMO, as a retired Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE), the two UW transcript images I have seen published in Corsi’s book (copy of a circa 1970’s hard copy and a recent computer printout) claimed to have been released by UW in response to FOIA requests are consistent with each other and genuine.
Prosecutors of the liberal State of Washington and lawyers from UW, would have been expected to be all over Corsi if he published a forged transcript for the mother of POTUS Barry.
Having followed the debunking claim closely, it was based on a false assumption that the circa 1970’s hard copy didn’t “look like” a 1962 transcript. It is this claim that is easily debunked, not the circa 1970’s transcript.
The recent UW computer transcript affirms the hard copy image and actually has more information about Stanley Ann’s UH courses that UH has been willing to release recently. The UW transcript shows her transfer credits from UH for attending Russian class in the Fall of 1960. The UW hard copy shows her courses and graduation from Mercer High in 1960 as well. The hard copy shows her Seattle address consistent with the Polk Directory.
Proof that the circa 1970’s UW hard copy is not a 1962 document can be found in typed notations updating the “card” record for Stanley Ann’s subsequent UH BA and MA degrees the MA having been completed in the early 1970’s.
I have no idea why his head looks large in some images and small in others, or why he sometimes appears to be white and almost orange in another, maybe it’s poor lighting or bad development technology. I do know that Virginia Goeldner said that Madelyn told her in 1982, that the coloured boy whom they had brought up, who was at college, was someone whose MOTHER had died in 1970.
And the Goelnder video in which they are surrounded by images, was presented after she made that statement, and the original article was removed and replaced with another almost instantly.
Original article link of FR:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2162856/posts
Video Link, no audio, the site that had the original video with sound has taken it down:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Nun-ht4HFg
The images the Goeldner’s are surrounded with are what we all have seen. They didn’t come from Virginia, because if she had had the kind of contact with the Dunhams in Hawaii that image collection on the video is meant to illustrate, she would NOT have believed that STANLEY ANN DUNHAM was the MOTHER - because she was told the MOTHER died in 1970.
So we need to ask, why did Madelyn tell Virginia that? Might that indicate just when it was they became guardians of zero?
Only one problem with that idea, Auntie Eleanor wasn’t related to the mother of zero, Mary the baby-sitter is/was.
Let's try and stick with the little we think know; Susan said, and Maxine confirmed, that Stanley Ann Dunham borrowed a car from a friend of her mothers...I think it was Maxine who said that friend of her mother's lived on Mercer Island. And it was with that car, that SAD visited Susan, with a three weeks old baby she didn't know how to change its diaper. She told told Susan virtually the life story of Anna, who was meanwhile living at the boarding house where Mary was baby-sitting, if we can believe there was a baby there. Mary certainly knew ANNA, and Mary never named her Stanley Ann Dunham, nor did she name the baby. Mary baby-sat, in her own words, when her own daughter who was born in July 1959, was 18 months of age. At a subsequent interview she changed that story to a seven month old child in August 1961. BOTH INDICATE A JANUARY BIRTH. So while Mary was baby-sitting a child in January 1961, zero wasn't born yet. Or, while she was baby-sitting a seven month old child in August, Stanley Ann Dunham was showing a three-weeks old infant to Susan Blake, and telling her how much in love she was with a black man from Kenya and she was going to BOSTON that very same day - and Susan NEVER SAW HER AGAIN.
Kapioloni is run by racists, KKK members and birthers.
We need Al Sharpton to pay them a visit to make them put up a statue of our first communist president.
Maybe we can organize. Have Acorn crash the place.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3049029/posts?page=372#372
And if you follow on from there, trying to make sense of the U of WA transcript, you would need to believe that within a very short period, Stanley Ann Dunham returned from Boston, started at the U of WA on 19 September, although the semester commenced on 25th of that month, and Mary babysat for her in February/March 1962, which is the date mentioned by Mary when she was interviewed again...and although there were Mercer Island classmates of Stanley Ann Dunham who attended the U of WA commencing 1961; none have come forward to say they saw her at the university in Seattle.
How did Mary reach that February/March 1962 revision? Might she simply have added seven months to August 1961 - forgetting that the transcript which Charlette Le Fevre indicated ‘had been found’ started IN SEPTEMBER?
They really are counting on people being totally stupid. Anyway, I’m handing over to our resident critic now, last time I locked horns with him, I was reported to the Boss and warned about my attitude.
Hmm. Lost his law license you say? Now that's interesting. Now Greg, if that were true, don't you suppose there would be a story on that in the NYT? On MSNBC?
Another case of "Mentioned on FR, Disregarded Everywhere Else." MOFRDEE?
Yes America,your POTUS ....,and his astoundingly steatopygous wife ... are both, BOTH I say, disbarred lawyers. Move along here. Nothing to see. MOFRDEE.
ARDC | Lawyer Search: Attorney’s Registration and Public Disciplinary Record
Full Licensed Name: Barack Hussein Obama
Full Former name(s): None
Date of Admission as Lawyer by Illinois Supreme Court: December 17, 1991
Registered Business Address: Not available online
Registered Business Phone: Not available online
Illinois Registration Status: Voluntarily retired and not authorized to practice law
Malpractice Insurance: No malpractice report required as attorney is retired.
Public Record of Discipline and Pending Proceedings: None
The real story is between the lines. The Bar App used to be on line. In it, plain as day, were the "No Alias," "No Drug Use," "No Misdemeanors," statements.
Someone compared those statements with the content of "Dreams of My Father," and the jig was up. I reckon Bill Ayers should have sent him a copy before it went to press!
Ah, but Dreams is a memoir not an autobiography. The book’s preface states that some events and characters are intentionally fictitious.
Ah yes. The composite thing. How could one forget? The drug use, the other names, the other countries, the feelings, the fantasies ... still, G, with one's name on the cover as "author," could one be forgiven for thinking the man might at least have read the damn thing?
Just because I couldn't handle Ayers' deathless prose doesn't mean the subject of his efforts shouldn't try.
Why have you posted a photo of Stanley Dunham with his daughter, Ann, and a caption that suggests it is his sister, Virginia Goeldner?
Virginia on youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Nun-ht4HFg
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.