Posted on 07/23/2013 2:09:29 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
Don't give up yet. There's still plenty of time to attempt to read her books.
Cite, please.
Liberals would know. They are the greediest bastards on the planet, always demanding more and more of my hard-earned income at the point of a gun. And yes, their greed is destructive. Just look at Detroit.
You shouldn't, since the budget was never balanced. Another big lie from the Democrat Party. The last time our government did not spend more than it took in was 1957.
On the contrary, conservatives need to keep this philosophy in arms reach. With it I can amaze friends and family by predicting what will be on the next days news!
No cite available. It appears I had it wrong. At your prodding, I checked out a few biographies, and she apparently came to her atheism in high school in Crimea, about four years before the communists had asserted control, which I believe occurred in 1921. From a look at her literary influences during that period, such as Victor Hugo, she was probably influenced toward atheism more by Enlightenment rationalism than Marx. So it is more that they had some common roots.
In any event, I apologize for the error. I am not sure how I acquired the misconception, but I appreciate your pointing it out to me.
still need to reread Witness by Whittaker Chamber, time better spent
Apology appreciated. Now if all the other misinformed Rand haters would consider it, that would be progress.
Anyone who was a communist traitor cannot be forgiven.
In that 35 years I worked for 2 privately held family owned companies. Both were fine organizations.
I saw what happened with the advent of the early LBO’s and then the “acquire/downsize” model of business. No one built anything, just rearranged the pieces and shed a lot of employees and customers. In the long run, that stopped working.
The contributing factor that is never mentioned is the tax rate. When the Reagan administration reduced the top corporate rate (and it needed to be reduced) from 72% to 27% (rough numbers that I remember) there was an explosion of growth. Before it was insanity to make large profits, because you simply gave it to the Feds in the form of income tax. So the model that they pursued was to build the best possible organization and solid growth. The win was in capital gains, not in operating profit. After the tax cut the green eyeshade bean counters said this is nuts, we simply cut the employees in 1/2 and all that money drops to the bottoms line. It worked, the first time, less well the 2nd time, poorer still the 3rd time. Eventually there was no fat to cut and it destroyed the business growth and the companies found themselves in trouble.
Almost all industries practiced some form of this.
But with Obozo boosting the regulation and BS to comply with it is much much worse. The trainwreck approaches.
He saw the light, changed and then turned in the Commie traitors
Ayn Rand’s “Capitalism, the untried ideal” is a very good book.
I have never liked Rand’s nature. I do not think it is necessary. But her rebellion to compulsion is another matter. I totally agree with that part of her make up.
Well, my repulsion toward Rand is not based on when she acquired her atheism, which is a relatively minor historical detail, but that she did espouse atheism, and integrated it into her philosophical system. As I said before, if she comes to certain natural law realizations with which theistic conservatives agree, that’s great. But like Marx, she regarded faith as an enemy to reason, and debilitating to human psychological processes, which is, coincidentally or not, perfectly aligned with the attitude of the old soviet communists, and their modern leftist counterparts, that people of faith are mentally ill. That is not a matter of speculation, and it is due cause to treat her overarching philosophy with considerable caution. That is not hatred. That’s just good sense.
How many perished at the hands of Stalin thanks to WC’s help?
No sympathy.
Blaming Ayn Rand for a poorly run conglomerate is ridiculous. I’m not keen non her writing style and she argues the best of positions to extremes, but the fundamental truths that she conveyed are not discredited by one corporate raider.
Conservatives are under no obligation to worship Ayn Rand. Rand has about as much credibility as Anton Lavey or Ragnar Readbeard. And about as much relevance too.
It is still a very eye opening book. but you have a point I never thought of.
one of the points in his book is that for a large segment of the population, you can just fall into it without being cognizant of what you are embracing
Totally.
For those who didn't/don't need to be ‘educated’ on the realities by having them candy-wrapped in exciting novels there is Rands: “Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal.”
http://www.intellectualconservative.com/article3290.html
postscript: Sears started falling apart long before the Internet when they abandoned what had built them: the one big biannual catalog with everything in it to the plethora of small catalogs that choked your mailbox every week - that highlighted only a few items each. That one big catalog was like Amazon on paper - A one source shopping list. Then they got behind the curve with the advent of the Internet...and never caught up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.