Civil rights case vs. Zimmerman won't be simple

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/2013/07/15/civil-rights-case-zimmerman-won-simple/u4NNXk5VRdpQMPZIB5R23M/singlepage.html ^

[ExTxMarine]

Once again, as always, how did Martin have the right to go wherever he wanted but Zimmerman didn’t?

I have asked that of many people, especially those who say, "If Zimmerman never got out of his truck..." I asked them, when was the last time you called the police to get permission to get out of your truck, in your own damn neighborhood? These people really have no logic, nor reason to their mindset - they are zombie-like drones repeating folklore like it has some kind of actual meaning.

They are simply a bunch of idiots grasping, reaching and contriving a reason to be zombie-like drones.

Basically, if the feral chill-runs are out wilding in your neighborhood, your only legal recourse is to stay inside where ever you are and hope/pray they don't attack your location. Because you have no right to see what is happening. You have no right to interfere with their "right" to wilding. And you definitely have no right to defend yourself from the actions of any feral chill-runs; it is your duty to lay there and take the ass-kicking that you deserve for trying to interfere with their wilding - hopefully you don't get killed in the process. Of course, it is your own fault for getting involved.

Please note: I am not saying, inferring or suggesting that Saint Martin was out "wilding." I am simply exaggerating their premise to show the absolute stupidity of the "he got out of his truck" argument.