Just testing the site....
was unable to get “post reply” to work several pages into the thread...it would kick me back to the first page of the thread...
Crap...post reply still wontr work for me...Oh well....I will wave at all of you while I simply kick back and read your astute observations :-)
People say, “well, if Zimmerman had not followed him, and if he had never gotten out of his truck, this would have never happened.” Well, if Martin had gone home when he ran and Zimmerman lost sight of him, Martin would still be alive. The mistake people are making is they are looking at this from an emotional point of view rather than from a legal perspective. Those who look at it completely in accordance with the law, and strictly from a legal perspective can only maintain he is not guilty. Unfortunately, there are six women on this jury, and women can have the tendency to move on emotion rather than intellect. I think they will convict him of manslaughter purely from an emontional perspective rather than a study of the facts and making a determination based strictly upon the law. This will be most unfortunate for GZ and our justice system which has become corrupted by liberalism and cultural stupidity.
Let me tell you how it works. Each of the jurors has already and perhaps a long time ago made up her mind. Now each has to pretend to others and to the authorities that she is “doing her job”, weighing the evidence, making a careful decision. That, folks, takes time. Pretending you work hard must take time. Nature of the beast. Been there, done that.
NBPP: RACISTS!
And, their "costumes" look silly and out-of-date.
Why can't they come over to the civil side....
They should take up the issue of black on black crimes.
NBPP might have validity there. But when is that ever going to take place...
They are a parody of themselves.
To borrow a few words from the trial:
NBPP: what a bunch of f'ing *ssholes.
How about a recipe for a tripe soup?
Favorite Cooking Songs,Tell us your Favorites,breakfast,lunch,dinner, supper,etc.Freeper Canteen 7~13~13
What I find REALLY odd, is that the Post Reply feature is NOT working for me ONLY on THIS thread! I am able to get it to work on other FR threads.........Weird (and might I add, annoying as hell)
Being the old fart that I am I can still wheeze with pride “Uncle Chip Rocks”
(satire) It's the remaining shreds of humanity struggling to escape the body. The eyes are windows to the soul, after all.
There has been much speculation on the extent and reasoning behind the Administration’s meddling in the Zimmerman trial. From the obvious pushing for an arrest when one was not forthcoming to the ‘If I had a son...’ statement, one has to wonder if the doctoring of Zimmerman’s photo to lighten his skin to portray him as white was also orchestrated from on high. What would be the reasoning for this and what is hoped to be accomplished?
From the beginning this has been portrayed by Obama’s sycophant left wing media as a white man shooting an innocent black child. But just the pictures tell a different story. The portrait of innocence Martin was not and neither was he a child. As for Zimmerman can anyone say that looking at him, his mother, and his uncle in the courtroom the first thought you have is “white people”? So what is really going on here?
The tensions between blacks and Hispanics has been going on for decades in every American city and prison. However, the Democratic Party needs to control these tensions as they could fracture the Democrats and weaken their power. Thus they had to orchestrate this as a ‘white vs black’ issue. We now have the why, but what else are they accomplishing?
A subtle message is being sent by this Administration that seems to have escaped media attention. IF YOU ARE HISPANIC, YOU DON’T MATTER. In essence the Democratic Party is making it clear, blacks in the Democratic Party are the house workers and Hispanics are the field workers. The black power brokers in Washington see they are about to be overtaken by Hispanic demographics and are sending the clear message that the Hispanic place on the Democratic Party Plantation is on a lower rung.
Imagine if Hispanics had even a tenth of the race-baiters that American blacks have. Now imagine if most Hispanic radio stations had been portraying this trial honestly, that one of their own was being railroaded by the Obama administration. The outcome and aftermath of this trial would be dramatically different and it would not bode well for the Democratic Party. The fact is that Washington was able to control the entire narriative regarding this trial. Only time will tell if the Hispanic community will wake up and break their Democratic Party chains.
Unbelievable that we are biting our fingernails over a case that if everything had been the same except that it had been a black person instead of Zimmerman, liberal whites and liberal blacks wouldn’t give a damn about Martin.
When these ladies will come out all depends on the quality of the accomodations. The higher, the longer it’ll take. Nothing beats free.
Thank you, Uncle Chip, for providing the coverage.
There may be two upsides to this trial:
01. ) Mr. Zimmerman is acquitted.
02. ) Just-Us Hold’em goes after Mr. Zimmerman on fed charges.
Could 02. ) be the straw that breaks the camel’s back and people finally wake up then actually DO something about it?
Here’s a good one:
Spinach Bread
3 packages Pillsbury crescent rolls
2 packages chopped spinach, thawed & well drained
2 eggs
Pinch of salt & pepper
1 large block jack cheese, grated
1 package sliced pepperoni
Mix spinach, eggs, salt & pepper together.
Place 1 ½ packages of rolls in the bottom of a 9x13 greased pan, entirely covering bottom & about halfway up sides to form a bottom crust. Spread spinach mixture on top. Layer on pepperoni, then shredded cheese. Top with remaining rolls to form top crust (seal edges well). Brush top with melted butter or margarine. Bake at 350 for about 40 minutes or until lightly brown.
I’m guessing the longer this goes, the more likely it will be a hung jury.
And it would also seem that the lack of a quick deliberation and verdict would rule out both 2nd degree murder and/or an outright acquittal.
But I’m not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV, so who knows.
Thoughts?
I think that giving the jury a choice, as in this case (I’m not talking about recipes this time) is a nasty trick.