The left wants to import as many Catholics as they can, and legal is the best of all, because they can vote very soon after arrival.
It is what the left counts on.
Posted on 04/02/2013 6:51:34 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Screed? You are lying about that and made it up, not only is it not a screed, I don’t even say it.
The Catholic denominations devotion to the left is what the left pins it’s hopes on.
You know very well the effect that the Catholic voter has had on America, does have on America, and will have on America, you know it, I know it, and the pro-abortion/pro-homosexual left movement knows it, yet you refuse to condemn importing them, knowing what it means to conservatism.
It seems that you must have chosen a side in the culture war against America.
Like I said earlier - the effect of the Catholic voter is the same as if they never voted at all.
Democrats don’t need Catholic support. Republicans do. That’s how the coalitions work these days.
It is amazing the dedication you show in defending pro-abortion Obama voters and to importing more of them to replace the American pro-life voters.
Liberal voters and the necessity of winning them moves all American politics to the left, it moves all politicians and all parties to the left.
Democrats depend on the Catholic vote and fight to keep importing them by the millions so that they can write a new future for America and I think by now, we can conclude that they have your full and dedicated support as you continue to argue for their defense.
“However, if there is one man who can take the most credit for the 1965 act, it is John F. Kennedy. Kennedy seems to have inherited the resentment his father Joseph felt as an outsider in Boston’s WASP aristocracy. He voted against the McCarran-Walter Act of 1952, and supported various refugee acts throughout the 1950s. In 1958 he wrote a book, A Nation of Immigrants, which attacked the quota system as illogical and without purpose, and the book served as Kennedy’s blueprint for immigration reform after he became president in 1960. In the summer of 1963, Kennedy sent Congress a proposal calling for the elimination of the national origins quota system. He wanted immigrants admitted on the basis of family reunification and needed skills, without regard to national origin. After his assassination in November, his brother Robert took up the cause of immigration reform, calling it JFK’s legacy. In the forward to a revised edition of A Nation of Immigrants, issued in 1964 to gain support for the new law, he wrote, “I know of no cause which President Kennedy championed more warmly than the improvement of our immigration policies.” Sold as a memorial to JFK, there was very little opposition to what became known as the Immigration Act of 1965.”
“Democrats depend on the Catholic vote”
No, they don’t. Simple math demonstrates this not to be the case. Remove all the Catholic voters from the electorate. Do the Democrats lose? No.
Of course the democrats depend on the Catholic vote, why do you fight so fiercely for the democrats and their voters?
What kind of agenda is that, to want more democrat voters imported?
Since you know that Catholic immigrants are going to destroy America, conservatism, the pro-life movement, and marriage, and everything else, do you want to stop their importation?
Of course the democrats depend on the Catholic vote, why do you fight so fiercely for the democrats and their voters?
What kind of agenda is that, to want more democrat voters imported?
Since you know that Catholic immigrants are going to destroy America, conservatism, the pro-life movement, and marriage, and everything else, do you want to stop their importation?
I just proved that the Democrats do not depend on the Catholic vote.
All you have proved is which political agenda that you support by saying anything to defend the democrat voters and the importation of millions more of them.
You have it mixed up with 'holy joe' which is an insult.
Aside from being a weird guy, and posting nonsense and false information and claims, you are also a liar, you must really dislike those people.
I don’t see the problem with the legal immigration of millions of Catholics to America. Do you?
you mind is getting entirely too rigid to enjoy a discussion and debate board.
The left wants to import as many Catholics as they can, and legal is the best of all, because they can vote very soon after arrival.
It is what the left counts on.
LOL,your fake statistics and anti-Christian name calling are not useful anywhere in life.
you are the one who is into anti-Christian name-calling.
One presumes they would vastly prefer Mexicans to Catholics.
Mexico being such an overwhelmingly Catholic nation which during almost it’s entire history was around 96 -98% Catholic almost as Catholic as America was Protestant when it was created, Mexicans who become Americans are usually Catholic.
Catholic Hispanics naturally make much better democrat voters than Protestant Hispanics.
Mexico being such an overwhelmingly Catholic nation which during almost it’s entire history was around 96 -98% Catholic almost as Catholic as America was Protestant when it was created, Mexicans who become Americans are usually Catholic.
Catholic Hispanics naturally make much better democrat voters than Protestant Hispanics.
I just realized that you probably meant that the left would prefer atheist Mexicans to Catholic Mexicans, actually just like American Catholics and atheists, they vote for the same political party.
Oh. I see. So you’re saying that the Mexican Catholics who immigrate to America are Americans?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.