Skip to comments.
Alaska Bill exempts state from Federal firearms bans, criminalizes attempts at enforcement
http://legiscan.com/AK/text/HB69 ^
| 16 Jan 13
| Justin Giles
Posted on 01/17/2013 10:45:32 AM PST by SENTINEL
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
1
posted on
01/17/2013 10:45:41 AM PST
by
SENTINEL
To: SENTINEL; Travis McGee; 2ndDivisionVet
2
posted on
01/17/2013 10:47:28 AM PST
by
SENTINEL
(Kneel down to God. Stand up to tyrants. STICK TO YOUR GUNS !)
To: SENTINEL
More than one way to skin a commie - at the state level.
3
posted on
01/17/2013 10:57:30 AM PST
by
jersey117
To: SENTINEL
This is one of many reasons why I want to move to Alaska.
4
posted on
01/17/2013 11:00:06 AM PST
by
notpoliticallycorewrecked
(Our military does not kill babies, those that commit abortion kill babies.)
To: jersey117
"The Alaska Misdemeanor charges for Class B also involve
going to jail for about the period of six months or paying the equivalent amount of $1,000. this price can also be lesser depending on the particular offence committed."
The right to self defense in Alaska, on one's own property, against someone committing a crime is virtually unrestricted.
5
posted on
01/17/2013 11:02:24 AM PST
by
SENTINEL
(Kneel down to God. Stand up to tyrants. STICK TO YOUR GUNS !)
To: SENTINEL
6
posted on
01/17/2013 11:03:52 AM PST
by
HollyB
To: notpoliticallycorewrecked
7
posted on
01/17/2013 11:06:54 AM PST
by
hattend
(Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
To: SENTINEL
Between this and the pot issue, we may just fix our fed govt problem!
8
posted on
01/17/2013 11:07:14 AM PST
by
stuartcr
("I upraded my moral compass to a GPS, to keep up with the times.")
To: SENTINEL
It has to be passed, then it has to stand up to the “sure-thing” decision that it is “unconstitutional.”
We are long past using law to stop oppression.
9
posted on
01/17/2013 11:07:32 AM PST
by
Wordkraft
(Remember who the Collaborators are.)
To: Wordkraft
I agree with you, but it is good to see some legislative push-back.
10
posted on
01/17/2013 11:10:53 AM PST
by
SENTINEL
(Kneel down to God. Stand up to tyrants. STICK TO YOUR GUNS !)
To: SENTINEL
How quick will this go through? I'm sure Parnell will sign??
In the past there have been fed regulations that Parnell has refused to enforce.
Parnell has always been bought & Paid for by Big OIl, but ya have to support Parnell because he does do the right thing on many issues.
Out here in the rural areas, everybody has & hunts with old military rifles. Nothing better than the 6.8 around my neck on a 2 point cross country on the snowmachine.
11
posted on
01/17/2013 11:12:38 AM PST
by
Eska
To: SENTINEL
Two reasons why Alaskans need their guns:
12
posted on
01/17/2013 11:14:48 AM PST
by
Slyfox
(The key to Marxism is medicine - V. Lenin)
To: SENTINEL
And when Holder declares that anybody involved will be charged for obstruction of justice, and hauled away by federal marshals?
13
posted on
01/17/2013 11:17:18 AM PST
by
PapaBear3625
(You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
To: SENTINEL
Will other states be protected by the EQUAL PROTECTION clause ?
14
posted on
01/17/2013 11:18:03 AM PST
by
Lionheartusa1
(-: Socialism & Communism are the equal distribution of misery :-)
To: SENTINEL
Will other states be protected against a ban by the EQUAL PROTECTION clause ?
15
posted on
01/17/2013 11:19:35 AM PST
by
Lionheartusa1
(-: Socialism & Communism are the equal distribution of misery :-)
To: PapaBear3625
I want to see lawmakers have the guts to call Obama out for not enforcing immigration law and supporting “sanctuary cities” if he tries to get tough about this. At least we have the Constitution on our side, his non-enforcement of immigration law doesn’t. In fact, it would be great if we started talking about “sanctuary states” for supporters of the Second Aendment.
16
posted on
01/17/2013 11:23:19 AM PST
by
mrsmel
(One Who Can See)
To: PapaBear3625
"And when Holder declares that anybody involved will be charged for obstruction of justice, and hauled away by federal marshals?Could get very interesting very quickly.
17
posted on
01/17/2013 11:24:38 AM PST
by
SENTINEL
(Kneel down to God. Stand up to tyrants. STICK TO YOUR GUNS !)
To: PapaBear3625
And when Holder declares that anybody involved will be charged for obstruction of justice, and hauled away by federal marshals?
You mean by 1 or 2 of the less than 15 or 20 US Marshal's in the whole state of Alaska? The US Marshal Service isn't an army, there's less than 4,000 in the whole US and territories and I'm going to bet 99% of them are going to be in the lower 48 busier with other crap to do.
It's the same as local police trying to enforce unconstitutional laws.....if they try, it's going to get their already small numbers even smaller.
18
posted on
01/17/2013 11:31:00 AM PST
by
brent13a
To: brent13a
Put another way, how many local law enforcement officials would be willing to arrest a federal officer, knowing that laying hands on him subjects them to between 8 and 20 years in federal prison under
18 USC 111?
19
posted on
01/17/2013 11:43:51 AM PST
by
PapaBear3625
(You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
To: SENTINEL
I have already lost count on how many states have done this, how many have introduced bills, etc. It is happening fast, however. The reaction time of Republican legislatures and governors is getting very fast.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson