Professor Blames Mass Shootings on ‘White Male Privilege’

Approximately 75% of the 12,664 murders reported by the FBI in 2011 were committed by blacks or hispanics. What does he blame that on I wonder? I’m guessing he just chooses to ignore that little inconvenient reality like every other liberal.

In the 90's, in an article on 'stranger murders' that appeared in Scientific American in 1994/5/6, the authors broke down the then-current FBI/DoJ stats, which were obfuscated by introducing a category of murder assailants of nonblacks whom they labeled "unknown". There were no "unknown" races attacking blacks; 91% of the murderers of black decedents in the late 80's to mid-90's (basically, the crack-cocaine wars) were themeselves other YBM's.

You could look at other categories of violent crime against non-blacks and see that "Peanut" was the party responsible. I named him that after a murderer in Houston in about 1991. An elderly couple in a silver Lincoln rolled up to a stop sign in the bad part of town ..... evidently having taken a wrong turn coming home from Houston's Hobby Airport ..... and were promptly attacked by "Peanut", a YBM about 12 y.o. who was riding around on a bike with a high-quality, high-cap pistol stuck in his trademark baggy pants under his baggy shirt. He blew them both away through the driver's side window in a shower of lead. Reason? Cops never told us, but white skin and a Lincoln probably had something to do with it.

The other constant lie was, "it's all about the money". With respect to black-on-black "turf" crime, that would appear to be the case. Other than obfuscation, the FBI wasn't contributing much to the public knowledge store about black-on-white crime.

With all the "Peanut" murders attributed properly and the "unknown" category unmasked, it turned out that YBM's were responsible for 91% of black victims' murders and about 50% of nonblacks' murders. At that time, about 25,000 people were being murdered annually.

One other trend shown by the Scientific American article was validation of the truism articulated by others, viz., that murder stats track with the economy. A return of prosperity would likely be accompanied by new, higher murder trends.

Hadn't thought of that .... but when I was reading the Scientific American article, just a couple of years after the Los Angeles riots (and by the way, re-reading old magazines, I see that the major themes haven't changed very much: reading Soldier of Fortune from October 1996 about the Khobar Towers bombing in Dharan that year reminded me of some things -- but the quality of the Clinton regime, as today's Holder Justice, was just as rank and nasty), I got the impression that the task before criminologists confronting the murder epidemic that had settled in on the country was to figure out who else besides black America was murdering everybody. That is, black crime was so overpoweringly omnipresent as practically to make blacks the default criminals in everything -- and then, clearing away the "black-on-X" factor allowed them to see what else was going on, underneath the Johnstown Flood of black criminality and mayhem. But the fact of life was black crime, and the two great categories they settled on to study criminality were "black crime" and "everybody else".

In future, as Hispanic and Asian fractions of American underworld life advance, the kaleidoscopic view may return, but that day hasn't come yet, except near the borders and in areas where the U.S. has been colonized by a succession of Mexican governments.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.