Posted on 11/10/2012 5:13:59 AM PST by SeekAndFind
If you guys need a lunch to help you in your endeavors... ping me.
I’m just a cook. It’s what I do.
/johnny
Every year it's the same old tired worn out story! It's like the dems playing the wealthy/rich = republican = bad card.
The GOPe/republican party and their cohorts can go FT!
The GOP establishment went through this in ‘96. They couldn't admit that they rammed a doddering, old clown onto the ticket. Instead, we were told that Clinton was invincible!
Show up and fix the problem, or stop bitching.
No, the margin actually does matter. Every additional vote Romney got cuts in how much of a mandate Obama can claim.
Romney was at least competitive losing by only around 2.5%. Considering how effective Obama's turnout machine was and how awful Mitt's turned out to be, it is pretty clear that the battleground states are pretty close and there is always as much support for Romney's agenda as there was Obama's.
You on the other hand accomplished nothing other than to further prove the irrelevancy of 3rd party's (aside from potentially being a spoiler occasionally). You were a complete nonfactor as I and others correctly told you you'd be. Not one bit of good was accomplished with that vanity run and you should man up, admit as much and use your energies to push the GOP in a better direction going forward. We need intelligent, politically active people like you - and it is extremely sad to see you dedicate your energies to 3rd party timewasters.
Oh, I remember it well, and am convinced to this day that Palin brought MILLIONS of votes to McCain that he otherwise wouldn’t have gotten.To anyone with any common sense, there is no reason to believe she wouldn’t have done the same thing for Romney,were it not for the overwhelming influence of those “official” RNC ers you named. It’s only commonsensical
to assume that would’ve happened, but once the R Establishment made her radioactive,(an exercise of cynicism even worse than what the Left did to her) they certainly weren’t going to do anything to promote her ascendancy post-Election 2008. Look, I was in the Tea Party virtually from the get-go and saw the once-in-a-lifetime excitement collect around Sarah and I was profoundly sppalled by the way she was treated by the Dems the Pubs, and the MSM—it was that first speech that did it—incredibly “nervy” and self-confident-—like something we’d never really seen before.
The coward McCain allowed her, but only for a little while, to play the Anti-Obama, a role which HE should’ve played.
Once “her own party” disowned her I knew her immediate destiny would be to promote and attract support for selected Tea Party candidates in the mid-term. What I DIDN’T expect was the Republicsn Establishment not to have learned any lessons from 2008 and 2010, but it’s now clear that they didn’t.Even before Romney became the offical nominee this time around, I said here on FR that Romney becoming the nominee would result in more chaos in the Tea Party than the election of Obama in 2008. I was wrong again. The Tea Party in Congress proved to be a bit of a mixed bag, but eventually all of them, like most of us on FR, had to line up behind Romney, and keep our fingers crossed..,,..It was definitely trending here on FR, that Gingrich should’ve been the nominee, if for no other reason than that he would destroy Obama in the debates—he would’ve, even though Romney got a good start in the first one. NOW, however, it is clear that the chaos I predicted pre-election, shows up post-election, in the unimaginable Romney loss.
Well, here's where I fix "The Problem."
*I Have unregistered as a republican.
*I will convince my fellow conservatives to form a new party.
*I will go door to door to convince people NOT to vote dem or republican.
*I will cause as much consternation as I possibly can to get in the face of dem/GOPe
*Every chance I get I will tell the republican party/GOPe/RNC to GFT!
Every politician who wants to run has to prove they are conservative by following a set standard of by laws.
I'm sorry, but as far as I'm concerned the GOPe/dems are equal enemies. I don't care if rino/moderates want to join the NEW party they will just have to always take a backseat to the conservatives. They will have NO say so in policy or platform.
There's my "problem" fix.
As if there was was any appreciable difference.
You don't get it, do you? This is NOT about Palin....it's about the GOP-E's utter contempt for Conservatives and the TEA party movement, as demonstrated in its behavior toward the governor over the past four years, with Tuesday's disastrous elections being the end result.
The first step to accountability:
I cast my ballot for Virgil Goode instead of pro abortion, pro gay marriage Mitt Romney and pro abortion, pro gay marriage Barack Obama.
So I supported the only candidate congruent to my beliefs.
You are correct. A Jeffersonian liberal or a libertarian will.
This when the GOP platform was more overtly conservative than it has been in years, and great pressure was being put upon Mitt to toe the line, with visible effect.
Yup, I understand. Totally. Meow.
I prefer PUSSY
Prolife Unless Someone Says, Y?
dforest figures if he says nice things about the GOPe they’ll leave him candy in his stocking.
Words < Actions.
Hasn’t Boner already caved on Obamacare?
Did Boner ever promise not to?
If you assumed that Mitt would never walk differently, then you brewed up your own self fulfilling prophecy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.