I also read on Breitbart this morning that some of the Benghazi documents were finally dumped on the committee investigating last night right before the debate.
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2012/10/23/Dump-Admin-Delivers-Benghazi-Docs-Hours-Before-Debate
PING
if anyone complains, tell them I said it was okay to repost Frank Gaffney articles anytime :)
It did not turn up in a search.
The search stinks. I’ve had multiple posts deleted. I would search before I posted, come up with nothing, only to find that what I posted had already been posted.
Arms Flow to Syria May Be Behind Benghazi Cover-Up
A Rapidly Unfolding, Deeply Disturbing Story
By Clare M. Lopez
EDITOR’S NOTE: The following article by Clare M. Lopez, one of the best analysts around, is riveting—and troubling, to put matters mildly. Foreign Confidential™ has repeatedly criticized the Obama administration for effectively narrowing the definition of the Islamist enemy to Al Qaeda alone under political cover of degrading the terrorist group (not “decimating” it, as claimed by the administration and its supporters) and killing Al Qaeda’s leader, Osama Bin Laden. It now appears, however, that we were wrong; incredibly, even Al Qaeda itself, or, at the very least, its ideological allies, are regarded by the administration as all right to appease and engage (align with), as shown by the deeply disturbing information that is surfacing in the aftermath of the … September 11... attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. The entire affair calls … cries out … for a Congressional investigation.
The day after the big Obama-Romney debate, as media and politicians were engaging in the usual after-action assessment frenzy, some of the most important issues surrounding the September 11 attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, remain unaddressed.
While it clearly matters (a lot) if and when the President told the truth to the American public about the terrorist nature of that attack and why the Department of State refused repeated pleas from its own diplomats in Libya for more and better security, the deeper, unaddressed issue is about the relationship of the U.S. government, Ambassador Christopher Stevens and the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya with Al Qaeda.
During the 2011 Libyan revolt against Muammar Qaddafi, reckless U.S. policy flung American forces and money into the conflict on the side of the rebels, who were known at the time to include Al Qaeda elements. Previously the number two official at the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli, Christopher Stevens was named as the official U.S. liaison to the Libyan opposition in March, 2011.
Ambassador Authorized to Aid Al Qaeda Sympathizers
Stevens was tasked with helping to coordinate U.S. assistance to the rebels, whose top military commander, Abdelhakim Belhadj, was the leader of the Al Qaeda affiliate, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG). That means that Stevens was authorized by the U.S. Department of State and the Obama administration to aid and abet individuals and groups that were, at a minimum, allied ideologically with Al Qaeda, the jihadist terrorist organization that attacked the homeland on the first 9/11, the one that’s not supposed to exist anymore after the killing of its leader, Osama bin Laden, on May 2, 2012.
More here:
http://chinaconfidential.blogspot.com/2012/10/arms-flow-to-syria-may-be-behind.html#links
Why might Obama want to arm Jihadists? Because it would make for a huge October Surprise in his favor if Assad could be toppled just before the election.....never mind that 90 days later we figure out that the Islamist nutjobs took over.
Indeed THIS COULD STILL HAPPEN, though the clock is running out on it occurring before November 6th..