courtesy ping, and Thanks.
The DNC made the film.
The maker doesn’t even exist.
These are the facts as I know them:
“Sam Bacile” doesn’t exist at all.
The claim that 100 Jewish donors contributed $5 million to make such a low-quality movie is a lie,
I have a strong suspicion that the real makers of this movie are Islamists, who wanted to provoke riots against Americans and blame it on an “Israeli Jew”.
These are the facts as I know them:
“Sam Bacile” doesn’t exist at all.
The claim that 100 Jewish donors contributed $5 million to make such a low-quality movie is a lie,
I have a strong suspicion that the real makers of this movie are Islamists, who wanted to provoke riots against Americans and blame it on an “Israeli Jew”.
How do you define “hoax”?
Today, the Independent is reporting shocking details about the attack on the Libyan consulate that resulted in the death of four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens. The details are so explosive that they will result in a Congressional investigation. In fact, they’re so explosive that they should result in the resignation of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
The only question now: What did Hillary Clinton know, and when did she know it?
Yesterday, we reported that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was responsible under the law for the “security
policies and programs that provide for the protection of all US government personnel … on official duty abroad.” Clinton herself seemed bewildered by the attacks on the Libyan consulate, asking, “How could this happen in a country we helped liberate, in a city we helped save from destruction?”
But according to the Independent, she had no reason to be puzzled. Quoting senior diplomatic sources, the paper reports, “the US State Department had credible information 48 hours before mobs charged the consulate in Benghazi, and the embassy in Cairo, that American missions may be targeted.” Nonetheless, “no warnings were given for diplomats to go on high alert and ‘lockdown,’ under which movement is severely restricted.”
It gets worse. According to security sources, the State Department had greenlit a “health check” at the consulate I preparation for 9/11. Nonetheless, the attackers broke the perimeter within 15 minutes of the Libyan mob forming. Local guards did nothing. One witness reported, “The security people just all ran away and the people in charge were the young men with guns and bombs.” According to sources, the Ambassador died from smoke inhalation after he was trapped in a building set on fire and besieged by rioters.
The Libyan government, for all its supposed regret, seems less than troubled by the whole incident. Wissam Buhmeid, who commands the Tripoli government-sanctioned Shield Brigade, which operates as police in Benghazi, stated, “There were definitely people from the security forces who let the attack happen because they were themselves offended by the film; they would absolutely put their loyalty to the Prophet over the consulate.
The deaths are all nothing compared to insulting the Prophet.”
Why wasn’t there better protection at the consulate? Because that’s the way Secretary of State Clinton wanted it; the State Department posted no Marines to the consulate. It was staffed instead by those Libyan “security” forces. The consulate also had “no bulletproof glass, reinforced doors or other features common to embassies.”
Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL), who sits on the Senate Intelligence Committee, “I am asking my colleagues on the committee to immediately investigate what role al-Qa’ida or its affiliates may have played in the attack and to take appropriate action.”
The story isn’t over in Libya. Violence continues. And classified documents have been stolen from the consulate, reportedly including the names of Libyans working with the Americans. Safe houses across Libya are now unsafe.
Secretary of State Clinton is responsible for the security of our staff, consulates, and embassies abroad. If the Independent’s report is correct, she has violated the most basic standard of duty. Both she and her boss, President Obama, must be held responsible.
“looks like the Muslims are rioting over a hoax”
Hmmm. I’m confused. A fake religion is rioting over a hoax. I know there is a name for that.
Just as Fast and Furious was designed to get rid of the Second Amendment, it makes sense that this film was aimed at our First Amendment rights.
crap may be pink. but you can’t deny crap regadless of color or shade.
So - with my Gene Siskel hat firmly in place - I rate this down there with Plan 9 From Outer Space as the worst 'film' ever. It's: Five Thumbs Down [I borrowed Ebert's chubby hands ;)]
ps: What's "offensive" about this 'film' is that somewhere a Tree died to make it possible.
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Too late for “analysis” I’m afraid, the short attention spans have moved on. All the news stories have told us of riots inspired by an American made movie insulting mohommad, so that’s all we need to know. Just like other scandals, the initial story is pounded home and any more information doesn’t see the light of day.
As JewishRighter said: “Wag the Dog scenario”
Maybe arranged by Saudi Intyelligence in cooperation with Hillary’s right hand MB woman, and all to help burnish (some how??) Obama’s “strong” foreign policy creds at elec time.
According to Glenn Beck this morning: our Libyan ambassador was first sodomized multiple times, then beaten to death, then his body was dragged through the streets. Or, as The One said, “Taken to the hospital by caring Libyans.” There are no words foul enough to describe Obama.
So, is it possible Chairman O and his administration shot before they took aim???
Two hoaxes.
The film and islam.
We’ll be seeing this on the evening news, right? (/s)
The DEMS are using it like fast and furious. Of course is is all fake. It is who planned it. I smell the world elite.
What, *again?*