Posted on 09/03/2012 2:38:13 AM PDT by Kaslin
Further, all who have worked in the "conservative" movement for decades know for a fact that a primary tool of so-called "progressives" has been to ignore challenges to their ideology--believing that by ignoring, they delegitimized such challenges.
Yes, Eastwood made a real "mark," because he carefully dissected and exposed what has been camouflaged and ignored by the media hacks who now pass for journalists in America.
As an example, one wonders at the often self-described intellectual progressives who support an "elderly statesman" image of Bidens Vice Presidency status while, about Clint Eastwoods brilliant satire, they flocked to the TV cameras these past few days to offer faux pity and sincere criticisms of what they described as everything from senility to chants that his "sad" appearance of being a doddering old fool.
It begins to dawn on me that we who saw it live may have been privileged to witness one of the master political addresses of the 21st century. Rhetors may be teaching from this speech 120 years from now. And no, I don't think that's a reach.
Check the Dana Milbank and Harold Evans threads currently running here in FR. Good examples.
at 44, i didnt have anything in memory to compare the speech against...that said, although i believed at first look that Clint was *searching* for his words, even so, the effect was lightning once he uttered the 'knife twisting' line...
i guess Im old enuff and have the ability to *listen* to my elders in an attempt to gleen some wisdom from their experience...
If it was merely a staged performance, it was masterful in delivery...either way, the truth hurts the commie machine, and thats a good thing...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.