Posted on 08/24/2012 4:51:36 AM PDT by huldah1776
He allowed in Democrat help to do that.
How is he supposed to stop what his Party opponent does?
And how is action taken by his Party opponent supposed to be him "allowing in" Democrat help?
"You stop running those ads about me, Claire!"
"Bite me, Akin, I'll run anything I want."
"Tell your Party members not to cross Party lines in an open primary, Claire."
"Bite me, Akin, they can vote any way they want."
That's political reality!
Wow, so that is his replacement plan? Overturn a single socialized medicine scheme and replace it with 50 mandated socialized medicine schemes?
And these Freepers are all so fixated on throwing Akin under the bus just to ensure that the RINO Senate will have one more vote to institute Romney’s backdoor socialist medicine plan?
What a bunch of cowards. Appeasers. Wimps.
If you state something is legitimate, it means you have categorized it.
Just like you did when you answered "Hell no".
If something is legitimate, ergo something else has to be illegitimate.
Yep, a false report of rape is an illegitimate rape as even you have categorized it.
If there are legitimate rapes, then there has to be illegitimate rapes.
I agree.
Yet we're right back to the unanswered question...
Where did he "equate", which is what your "equal sign" means, legitimate rape to be the same as an illegitimate, or false report of, rape?
There is a reason he hasn’t renounced RomneyCare.
Somebody remind me again why I should vote for Romney.
He has lost nothing.
TYhe Rasmussen poll is a GOPe ass-kiss poll to try to take out a conservative candidate.
You’re a part of that excrement-fest.
I think that your words say all that we need to know about you.
There is only one reason that’s been given that has some justification. However, even that is subject to Romney’s deceitful personality. That is that he is a personal friend of Benjamin Netanyahu and he will be better for Israel than will Obama.
Taxes: nope, he calls them “revenue enhancements” and does them anyway.
Abortion: nope, not only does he accept rape/incest exceptions, but he, in the past, is a flaming liberal on the issue.
Homosexualism: Nope. Not even Obama has advocated homosexualism the way Romney has.
Gun Control: Nope. Romney says that he likes bi-partisan gun legislation.
Big Gov’t Health Care: Nope. He wants you state to impose it instead of your fed. He’s among the idiots who believe the constituion says, “If it’s an area in which the fed can’t violate your rights, then states are allowed to.” That’s their interpretation of ‘states rights’.
Cronyism: Nope. Just different cronies than Obama.
This truly is a choice between Sodom or Gomorrah.
BTW, in case you didn't know, if you want to italicize a previous post copied for reference to make it easier to read, just put < i > (no spaces) at the beginning and < /i > (no spaces) at the end.
“TYhe Rasmussen poll is a GOPe ass-kiss poll to try to take out a conservative candidate.”
That river still flowing through Egypt there editor-surveyor?
The rape was horrific.
The reciprocity was satisfying.
He's like Romney after his agents in Virginia manage to spoil the primary ~ he kept silent. He's still silent.
When good men refuse to speak out against bad acts that means ~ what?
It means they aren't as good as you want them to be.
I have suggested dumping both of these guys for the same reasons.
And neither have their broad spectrum Conservative credentials in line ~ just an ACU rating (where applicable).
Supporting Akin is tarnishing your own conservative credentials.
I'm not here to be "popular" nor do I "move with the herd" as you damn well know. I think for myself and if that's considered a detriment by others then I count it as an asset simply because it causes such seeming consternation.
Hanging with the Democrats is not the way Conservatives do it.
you haven’t asked a question. you’ve made a declamation but there’s no there there!
So how do you think she would have responded if he had asked her to stop her "help" as you put it?
That’s not a question ~ all I know about Claire McCaskill is that she is an evil person. She might have sent one of her goons over to rough him up ~ just any sort of thing ~ figuring out what a crazy Democrat is going to say or do is really not in my campaign. I’m focused on Republicans!
You give an example of what she might do, I asked what you thought she might say!
...figuring out what a crazy Democrat is going to say or do is really not in my campaign. Im focused on Republicans!
If that were so then you wouldn't even be bringing up what she did in providing him "help". Her actions wouldn't be worthy of comment, according to your latest statement.
Does your "campaign" have an agenda?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.