Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is game changing technology.

40 pound projectiles traveling at 8,210 feet per second to ranges of 50-100 nautical miles.

1 posted on 08/03/2012 6:47:06 AM PDT by moonshot925
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: All

If we devote every cent from the next 711 FReepathons we can have it!


51 posted on 08/03/2012 8:34:01 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: moonshot925

How far did the big guns on WW II ships deliver to their targets??

It’s been a long time since I saw an episode of ‘Victory At Sea”, but I seem to remember they could hit a target from a great distance.


61 posted on 08/03/2012 9:30:04 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: moonshot925

When I was an aerospace engineer I designed an air-launched 100 kg projectile that could be fired straight into low Earth orbit. Cheap launch for small satellites.

The gun could also fire shells of over 200 kg at ground targets from 1000 km away. At 5 km/sec closing velocity they would have excellent penetration capability.

The gun itself was heavy, but a 747 could handle the load

The secret sauce that makes such a feat possible is still not known to the larger aerospace community.

If any contractors want to pick my brain on how to do this, I am available as a consultant.

You can see how I earned my nickname.


66 posted on 08/03/2012 10:37:17 AM PDT by darth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: moonshot925

The grammar in that article is atrocious. Existing railguns???

That being said I had heard that the projectile velocity for the GE gun (assuming this is it) at 100 miles was equal to the muzzle velocity of the existing cannons...

8000+- fps isn’t that impressive considering Polish AT rifles were approaching that in the 30’s.


74 posted on 08/03/2012 1:14:05 PM PDT by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: moonshot925
We already have GPS guided artilery which will lower costs significantly compared to an airstrike.

But unless the range goes up beyond a couple hundred miles, I don't think this is very useful. On ships, this is a much lower range than cruise missles and aircraft carriers, so against them the ship is at a disadvantage.

However, if they get the range up to a couple thousand miles, then its a game changer. We could even build launchers up the sides of Hawaii volcanoes, and cover the entire pacific. They would be invulnerable to torpedoes and cruise missles, ony a nuke would take them out.

79 posted on 08/03/2012 6:29:07 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson