Posted on 07/27/2012 6:41:57 PM PDT by NoLibZone
Then provide those words, because I’ve never seen them.
Provide a link to what you are accusing him of. Conservatives get called racist and all kinds of names all the time. It’s only right that you backup your accusation.
Start with post 47.
Especially for the long run. Most favored constituents depend on government directly or indirectly for their incomes. For the time being they own politics. And real, private sector (what’s left of it—excludes services dependent mostly on government-supported customers) conservatives won’t forget any time soon what’s happening to them and their loved ones.
Toward the other end of the default process, most favored constituents will lose all that they are now getting. Won’t be much money going into campaigns then.
Buchanan’s wrong, too, BTW—just wrong. ;-)
This is what William Buckley thought of Buchanan
http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/b/buchanan-pat/buckley-1991.html
http://frontpagemag.com/2012/ben-shapiro/pat-buchanan-anti-semite/
If the GOP dies, it won’t be because of demographics. It will be because of selfish elitists and opportunists who hold the reins of power within the party and do their best to maintain control of the shrinking pie.
Conservative columnists in D.C. and New York are part of the elite crowd. Maintaining the status quo is how they guarantee their own livelihood. Look and see how many of them supported Romney and did their best to submarine his opponents. Some conservative radio talk show hosts fall in that group as well.
Either the whole bunch gets pushed aside, or a new conservative party is formed while the GOP fades away. The status quo for the Republican leadership is close to being status gone. They aren’t acting on behalf of conservatives or conservative ideals. They’re acting for their own interests and watching out for their buddies, and growing the federal machine the same as the Democrats.
Demographics is destiny. LA and much of Cali is already like Mexico. .as Presidente Calderon put it “where there are Mexicans, there is Mexico”
Demographics is destiny. LA and much of Cali is already like Mexico. .as Presidente Calderon put it “where there are Mexicans, there is Mexico”
You have to provide Buchanan’s real words, not what people said he said or what they think he said.
Seriously, liberals call conservatives these names all the time. Why are you doing the same?
They have to understand that like Greece, they could tip it over and lose it all if they don’t keep a free economy.
Also, liberals have a way of grossing people out and hurting them socially with their love of criminals and hatred of normal people, their love of perverts and hatred of children and families, and their racism. The longer they stay in power, the more chaos and mayhem will ensue.
They are the new Whigs.
The democrats are the communist party.
The republicans are the new democrat party.
Conservatives have been pushed aside and will need to regroup somewhere eventually. The GOP pushed them out at their own peril.
So be it.
Sad how many supposed conservatives are willing to vote for a proven liberal.
Voting for your ideological enemy is far beyond pragmatism.
It is hypocrisy.
It is saying one thing and doing another.
A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.
Bush got more like 44 percent of the Hispanic vote in 2004, and that is probably more of a stretch than Eisenhower’s high estimate of 47 percent of the black vote in 56.
I was posting about Hispanics becoming Protestants, that is a demographic wild card that no one discusses.
Bush won 56% of the Hispanic vote that was Protestant, and in 2008 McCain won 48% of the Protestant Hispanic vote.
I think President Reagan can be trusted on this one.
As he aged, Buckley wanted acceptance in liberal social circles and he was jealous of Pat Buchanan:
http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Rec/rec.audio.opinion/2008-03/msg00036.html
There is a great discussion of the book here. Read all the comments, too:
Book Review: Suicide of a Superpower
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2800678/posts
I think Keynes said that.
Do you see a big move of Catholic Hispanics to protestant churches? I know a lot of protestant Hispanics, but haven’t noticed a trend going on. It does seem that Hispanics gravitate towards the more conservative protestant churches. The ones I know seem to be leaning Arminian, but that could be because there aren’t that many Lutherans around here.
Pew says that while they don’t make up 31% of the Hispanic population, they do make up about 31% of the Hispanic vote, it is a sliver of hope in the demographic future, but it won’t help much in states that have a weak Evangelical presence, like California.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.