Posted on 07/25/2012 1:48:38 PM PDT by Kaslin
Same here
Voting for a third party candidate is a vote for 0bama. Think about it
Oh and staying home in the 2006 election did also send a message which gave the rats the House and the Senate and the nation high unemployment and a miserable economy, plus the terrible 0bamaCare. Did you stay home in 2006 because you wanted to teach the GOP a lesson?
THANKS A LOT /s>
I never stay home on election day and I think third party zealots are fools.
I was mocking those who think simultaneously that the vote is too sacred to cast on a mere mortal while also thinking their vote decides nothing.
Are you saying you will vote to reelect that arrogant, lazy,lying pos occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave?
lol. I may be drunk but not that drunk....I will vote for the RINO Man Romney.
I am glad you clarified it. LOL
I believe it was Stalin who pointed out that it mattered not who voted, only who counted the votes.
I hope all the Freepers who won’t vote for Romney will at least volunteer to be poll inspectors to keep an eye on the liberal cheaters.
It is the very least they can do.
Thanks Kaslin.
We must gin up turnout to unprecedented levels, but at the same time we must not accept the typical RINO hosshiite about "Turnout cancels fraud." It helps a lot, but it most certainly does not.
The GOP has been miserable on the fraud front. We can not let the Democrats steal the big states without a a really tough challenge to fraud in the urban areas... a teeth-in-the-street approach to combat this kind of fraud ...20 mobile 20-voter squads that will vote in up to 50 precincts ... that actually happened in a NY congressional election. It is an extreme but not uncommon example.
The MAYOR of Detroit admitted that there were at least 100,000 invalid registrants in that city alone. Baltimore? LOL, Philadeplphia? California with an estimated half-million , that's 500,000 possibly fraudulent registrations.
Since Eisenhower convinced Nixon to turn the other cheek, the Democrats have been emboldened to steal election after election. The GOP has usually caved because its power is concentrated in safe seats received in exchange for compliance with Democrat wishes on policy and a guaranteed share of the spoils. Bob Dornan, Rossi, Coleman ... ask them how hard the GOP fought for them in clearly stolen contests.
It's not too late for spinal growth.
It was only close because a certain third party candidate siphoned tens of thousands of votes away from former president-elect Algore.
That’s right. A third party vote sends a message to the Democrats: “We surrender - YOU WON!”
Limbaugh's thesis was that if we turn out we can overcome vote fraud. That was vote fraud, and we almost lost it.
And Nixon? That was stolen too, and not without effect.
Thanks for clarifying the sarcasm on this extremely ill thought out 3rd Party âlessonsâ.
In the context of my first post it should have been obvious I was mocking those who thought the vote was too sacred to cast for any man with any defect - or that voting for a third party ‘sends a message’ (a message that you threw your vote away) - while simultaneously opining that the vote doesn't matter anyway, if the vote determined anything they wouldn't let us do it, that the election is decided by Soros, Dibold, the Trilateral Commission or whatever.
If the vote wasn't important people running for office wouldn't be on an endless quest to raise money to spend on election commercials.
If billions of dollars are spent on it - the people spending the money know it is important.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.