Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For conservatives, the question: Who is John Roberts?
Washington Examiner ^ | July 2, 2012 | Byron York

Posted on 07/04/2012 1:05:06 PM PDT by robowombat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: Sudetenland
Republicans and Bush were so obsessed with finding a candidate with no track record to defend that they bought another pig in a poke--just like Souter.

The Republican Party "leadership" is a sad joke. They are the perennial Charlie Browns with libs playing Lucy with the football. They are afraid of their own shadows.

Rather than pick a principled conservative jurist with a long track record of conservative--originalist--rulings and then mounting a full court advertising campaign and PR blitz to force Democrats into voting on the basis of ability rather than political ideology, they'd rather roll the dice with someone about whom they know little and assume much.

This is the same thing they do with everything in the conservative agenda. Rather than Roosevelt's "Talk softly and carry a big stick," Republicans like Boehner and the rest practice talking loudly and carry a piece of linguini--like their spines.

It doesn't matter how many times they get shellacked by the press, they still believe they can curry favor with them and be liked. It's like the guy who, every time you see him, he punches you hard on the shoulder and after 10 years of that, being astonished when next you see him, that he hits you in the shoulder.

It's hopeless. Deer in the headlights. Babes in the woods--except rather than having the excuse of ignorance or inexperience, they are just living a life of complete delusion.
21 posted on 07/04/2012 1:54:14 PM PDT by Sudetenland (Member of the BBB Club - Bye-Bye-Barry!!! President Barack "Down Low" Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Who is John Roberts? Yet another fool who thinks the “pooch punt” is a brilliant play in the NFL. “He’s lining up for the field goal. Here is the snap. NO! It is a pooch punt! That will teach ‘em!”


22 posted on 07/04/2012 1:56:44 PM PDT by LRS ("He's 12 slices shy of a 1/2 loaf of Bunny Bread!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

For death threats, yes,,, he could indeed have that press conference. But if his homo past was threatened to be revealed, he could have been influenced. Not only did he know that they owned him there,, but if he were forced to resign, he knows Obama would appoint another judge.

He was blackmailed.


23 posted on 07/04/2012 2:00:08 PM PDT by DesertRhino (perI was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

For death threats, yes,,, he could indeed have that press conference. But if his homo past was threatened to be revealed, he could have been influenced. Not only did he know that they owned him there,, but if he were forced to resign, he knows Obama would appoint another judge.

He was blackmailed.


24 posted on 07/04/2012 2:00:34 PM PDT by DesertRhino (perI was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Each Bush nominated a candidate many believed to be a stealth candidate at the time of the nomination process, Souter for GHWB and Roberts for W.

There is no excuse for a Republican president to nominate a stealth candidate about which little is known. If Republican presidents intend to nominate conservatives, it is known who they are, especially the conservatives who’ve been on a federal court for several years.

And with the Bush stealth candidates, the case can be made that they were both stealth liberals, or at least stealth moderates. The case can be made that the Bushes got the sort of justices they wanted in Souter and Roberts.

I don’t think there many people still around who’d try to make the case that either Bush was a conservative.


25 posted on 07/04/2012 2:10:56 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

I’ll bet it was pro bono.


26 posted on 07/04/2012 2:11:51 PM PDT by HerrBlucher ("The cross opens its arms to the four winds; it is a signpost for free travelers." GK Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

He’s just another guy who could have been great if he’d stuck to principle. But failed.


27 posted on 07/04/2012 2:12:09 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat; melancholy; azishot

So Steve Schmidt was pushing for Roberts.

http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=Steve+Schmidt+gay&ei=UTF-8&fr=moz35

I don’t know (or remember if I ever did know) whether Schmidt is a perv himself or just pro-perve. I’m starting to suspect Roberts is a perv.


28 posted on 07/04/2012 2:13:29 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
The blackmail aspect has nothing to do with threats of the usual Cook County knee breaker variety. The blackmail is that Roberts is a true closeted queer of the deepest lavender and is very fond of young boys. In the cesspool of DC this is nothing unusual as the queer sex, kiddie porn and sex and drugs community is quite large and as long as one plays by the unpublished but well known rules ones secrets will be kept. If one doesn't play according to the rules, which include when your markers are called in you do as told, then the Washington Post will courageously report on your secret interests. The last player this was done to big time was John Murtha who just wanted to use his office to make a lot of money. He did but found out he also had to become the famous ‘anti-war Marine patriot’. He really didn't like the publicity at first until he found out lots of dumb leftist dames wanted to jump his meaty bones.
29 posted on 07/04/2012 2:26:27 PM PDT by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

>>Roberts is not a “Machiavellian genius.” Roberts is a moral degenerate lifetime Washington D.C. politico, who is well known in the beltway to be borderline obsessed with his image. In other words, Chief Justice John Roberts emotionally operates on the same level as the average twelve year old girl, and just sold out not just the Republic, the Constitution and the entire American populace, but really the entire planet, because now that the United States is no more, the forces of evil will run absolutely rampant over the rest of the planet. And Roberts did it so that a bunch of coke-snorting sodomites and psychopaths in Georgetown will pretend to like him – for about five minutes. —Ann Barnhardt<<

The new Ann, hope she doesn’t turn on us like the other Ann.


30 posted on 07/04/2012 2:26:32 PM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: scram2
Why does any of this matter NOW? There are no elections for this position. He will be on the court until he retires or dies so why bother discussing him and his supposed motivations, allegiances and political bent?

Good grief, man. He sold out his country and gave us Obamacare.

Have you forgotten about the time-honored tradition of shame and scorn for scoundrels? Roberts needs to be seen by history for the villain he is.

31 posted on 07/04/2012 2:26:37 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

George Bush Senior gave us Souter. George W Bush apparently gave us another one. Unless a judge has a strong Constitutionalist background, people should assume they are liberal.


32 posted on 07/04/2012 2:29:21 PM PDT by winner3000 (ss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

George Bush Senior gave us Souter. George W Bush apparently gave us another one. Unless a judge has a strong Constitutionalist background, people should assume they are liberal.


33 posted on 07/04/2012 2:29:35 PM PDT by winner3000 (ss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

George Bush Senior gave us Souter. George W Bush apparently gave us another one. Unless a judge has a strong Constitutionalist background, people should assume they are liberal.


34 posted on 07/04/2012 2:29:58 PM PDT by winner3000 (ss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Decision was bad enough but then he had to joke about going to an impregnable fortress

That was a very telling comment about his attitude


35 posted on 07/04/2012 2:35:33 PM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Back stabbing weasel comes to mind.
I believe Obama knew he was going to loose and gave Roberts the idea. That is why it happened at the last minute and Obama knew about ahead of time. We now have one branch of government and the republic has died.


36 posted on 07/04/2012 2:41:34 PM PDT by cp124 (Government is value subtracted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

So basically, either we get Obama who will appoint more radicals like Kagan, or we get Romney who will appoint more liberals like Roberts who will vote with the radicals on most of the important issues anyway...

At least we won Citizens United. So there’s that.


37 posted on 07/04/2012 2:44:58 PM PDT by Random_User_250
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

You can make a credible argument that the Bush family has done great damage to the Republican brand and run off the Reagan Democrats with: “read my lips; no new taxes;” David Souter, Anthony Kennedy, John Roberts, “compassionate conservatives” adding a new drug entitlement, and abandoning the political battlefield by GWB to allow the Dems to retake the House & Senate, then failing to veto the reckless spending.


38 posted on 07/04/2012 2:46:32 PM PDT by Surfscoter (Surfscoter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Random_User_250

Worse. If this rumor contains a significant degree of truth it lifts a corner on just how foully corrupt the highest circles of the US Government are. What we have is corruption of the soul similar to Paris in 1788 or St Peters burg in 1916. This true evil of an incalculable nature and means we and our families are in the power of truly evil human beings who are completely unconstrained by any morality. The question is how to save our lives and liberties. People such as this will inevitably commit gross errors that will actually compromise the physical existence of the United States.


39 posted on 07/04/2012 2:53:25 PM PDT by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: dps.inspect

A TRAITOR!


40 posted on 07/04/2012 3:00:55 PM PDT by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson