1 posted on
06/15/2012 8:47:03 AM PDT by
dead
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: dead
The paintings might not be from humans? Democrats painted them, maybe.
To: dead
Where did they get the spray paint?
53 posted on
06/15/2012 11:02:59 AM PDT by
Vinnie
(A)
To: dead
Just more work for this guy.
To: dead
Pike also notes that DNA evidence now suggests that modern humans and Neanderthals interbred. The common name for these interbred creatures is "Democrats"
61 posted on
06/15/2012 11:36:58 AM PDT by
BlueMondaySkipper
(Involuntarily subsidizing the parasite class since 1981)
To: dead
"What we are saying is that we must entertain the possibility that these paintings were made by Neanderthals," Pike says. Those were humans' closest relatives, but they are not our species.....Pike also notes that DNA evidence now suggests that modern humans and Neanderthals interbred. If Neanderthals could interbreed with "modern humans", then by the definition of "species" they ARE of the same species as us. Neanderthals look like they are just another race of humans.
62 posted on
06/15/2012 12:03:02 PM PDT by
PapaBear3625
(If I can't be persuasive, I at least hope to be fun.)
To: dead
64 posted on
06/15/2012 12:19:09 PM PDT by
Oratam
To: dead
Neandrathals are not human? Only in the minds of ivory towered paleontologists who must have some excuse for their research.
If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, looks like a duck...
Neanderthals aren’t apes. Neanderthals walked upright. Neanderthals used their hands. Neanderthals looked human, so I would consider them human — maybe a different branch, but human.
To: dead
I’ve always thought there was something strange about them Spainerds.
78 posted on
06/15/2012 5:32:41 PM PDT by
Grimmy
(equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
