Posted on 06/07/2012 10:37:45 AM PDT by Perdogg
Gross, on multiple levels.
If you have a security clearance, I would recommend against going to cryptome.org.
C’mon, zer0. Slick Willie would stand behind him. I mean, the guy’s got credentials.
Paging Mrs. McQurk.
Jury needs some pics for deliberation
An affair, doing a journalist, giving away state secrets, giving the media access to bigwigs, bypassing security, raunchy language, tailoring laws to suit personal desires...
This is a resume enhancement for a democrat.
I agree. Need to see some photographic evidence of the WSJ miscreant.
Are they the ones that were doing it on the roof of the Iraq Palace? If so...there’s video of that. That is better than a blue dress.
He has already divorced Mrs. McGurk and married the slut.
She’s not so cute that she seems worth derailing your career over, then again politicians operate under the constraint that the woman you’re sleeping with needs to have something to lose if she blabs about the relationship.
Is this the story?
http://www.buzzfeed.com/mhastings/whistleblower-alleges-top-us-official-got-blowjo
Van Buren writes:
“Meanwhile, a State Department VIP apparently has had sex on an Embassy roof, captured on video, not that that matters.”
Then later in the blog:
What if a video existed that showed a prominent State Department VIP on the roof of the Republican Palace in Baghdad receiving, um, pleasure of an oral nature from another State Department officer not his wife, or even his journalist mistress of the time? What if that video has been passed around among Marine Security Guards at the Embassy to the point where it is considered “viral” with many copies made? What if the Deputy Chief of Mission, hand in hand with the Diplomatic Security chief (RSO) at the time, decided that the whole thing needed to be swept under the rug and made to go away, at least until some blogger got a hold of it.
Would that count as poor judgement? What if it was published during his oft-delayed Congressional hearings?
Tried to find some bigger ones, but all that comes up are those Cryptome email printout images.
As to the verdict, I think there's little doubt.
hey the media has been doing favours for the administration for years, may as well make the natural step and actually get on their knees literally.
yep! That is the story I am thinking of and it seems to match-up, too.
If that IS the right guy, he’s not getting his BJ from the ex-wife or the WSJ woman he married—it’s another woman!
Tangled web THAT is...hahahaha! I hope the video gets out—the creep deserves the embarrassment.
There’s still criteria for obtaining and retaining security clearances? How did Obama get them, or any member of his Cabinet for that matter?
I think i’m more inclined to call him the slut if the video rumour is true, that he’s being doing lot more women than just her.
The President is granted a security clerance on the basis of his election - no official security investigation is conducted.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.