Teen radio host says 'Obama makes kids gay' in hate speech posted to YouTube

Mail Online ^ | June 7 2012 | Emily Ann Epstein

[scottjewell]

Yes, if by muzzie you mean, “Muslim”, it would be tolerated for a few days, ignored, and then die a quiet death from lack of views.

[scottjewell]

Okay, this clarifies. But you can’t, then, just bless your category A and tell them to enter into a homosexual relationship and that God will bless it. If you do that then you ain’t following Thomas Aquinas or the Nichomachean Ethics. Show me where either of them says, “shoot, I’ve got this disorder and I didn’t choose it but, well, God blesses my disorder and when I act upon it, He won’t mind.” Well, being a Generation X-er, I must admit I am a strange hybrid of essentialism, Neo-Thomistic philosophy, and a large dose of "rights for the disabled, the minorities, the weak". The last is my downfall. I went to college in the 1990s. Enough said. It is a miracle I even had mentors who schooled me independently in classical Latin and ancient philosophy. :(

[scottjewell]

@ so_real The comments are hilarious ... for example "stop preaching hate you dumb little bastard!". Isn't that precious? Some liberals are not intelligent enough to comprehend hypocrisy. Yes, that is classic. The hate is only in the bigot's eye, while the board in the liberal eye goes undetected. What was even worse on facebook, were the rampant accusations that the boy-radio host is really a closet gay, panting for men. This too went undetected as hate speech.

[trailboss800]

I've come to believe over many years of study and working with people in homosexual lifestyle, that an identity disorder exists. For a child to participate in the act, he/she must disassociate from who they were actually created to be due to the repulsive nature of what is being forced on them. This creates a state within the child where the conscience is blunted and the child forms a defense system which says “what happened to me is OK and I'm not repulsive.” This newly formed defense system is now required to prevent reality shock of what has truly taken place.

[scottjewell]

Yes, this is the syndrome which NARTH seeks to cure. Of course, gay advocacy will have none of it.

[so_real]

"Tolerance for me, but none for thee." Ugh.

[so_real]

What was even worse on facebook, were the rampant accusations that the boy-radio host is really a closet gay, panting for men. This too went undetected as hate speech.

I've seen that elsewhere too. The irony that homosexual advocates would insult an individual by accusing that individual of being a homosexual is not lost on me. Either these people are not mental giants, or they are mentally disordered in some way.

[scottjewell]

Well, I think they have got this formula down-pat in their minds: “Any male who condemns homosexuality is really himself a closeted gay [they judge me, but really desire me, but are afraid of their own feelings].” It is really just a trick, to save their egos from pain. Problem is, it has been preached so often by gay advocacy, that many now accept this theory as hard, proven fact.

[scottjewell]

Here is a copy paste of a comment on Cowger's facebook page I saw just a minute ago: you have no idea what you're talking about you stupid, ignorant, homophobic c*nt! i hope you f**king die! ----This kind of comment actually saddens me. Besides being silly, hypocritical, etc., it is also the bewildered voice of someone who has swallowed the whole agenda hook, line, and sinker, and is baffled that there could be ANY refutation. Particularly from one of their own generation. In this sense, they are victims of the gay advocates.

[Chode]

[scottjewell]

And now also the typical and expected liberal response to this issue:

http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc6/269341_476304572394998_95934895_n.jpg

[HiTech RedNeck]

I’d agree as making logical sense, that the person is alienated from his normal self identity by the unpleasantness of what he experienced — perhaps tagging false shame onto what ought to be a real self identity. I was simply positing an additional animating principle in the mix, serving as a kind of false hero or hijacker to what you point out as being a weakly (if at all) defended personality. It would pretend to be a friend, but it’s an enemy, a prankster — in theological terms, a devil. A very tricky and cruel devil. And the person probably hasn’t the foggiest clue why he is so devoted to it; it defies his reason even if he is a genius. (They say the last thing a fish notices is water.)

I’d expect this sort of thing also to crop up in dysfunctional families where the parents, perhaps in spite of themselves, carry on cruelly and the child is so sensitive that he is easily hurt by that.

[HiTech RedNeck]

It’s more serious, granted, like a fatal pneumonia is more serious than a case of the sniffles. But in another sense it’s the same kind of thing. Such emphasis is being put by some on how horribly bad wrong it is, that some of the rest react without reflection by saying it’s not wrong at all. Yes it’s wrong, and yes, the compassion of society should be focused to want to help the habitual sinner overcome his habitual sin through every good means. The very idea of, say, a Homos Anonymous would be hooted down in today’s politically correct atmosphere. This is so, so wrong.

[scottjewell]

CNN Contributor Defends Radio Host Who Said Obama Turns Kids Gay http://www.advocate.com/politics/media/2012/06/07/cnn-contributor-defends-radio-host-who-said-obama-turns-kids-gay

[Eagles6]

A close relative in a related discipline agrees with you. Every single one.

[Chode]

pretty much...