Posted on 05/17/2012 10:58:09 AM PDT by AtlasStalled
Then why did you post the Section 301(g) excerpt at all?
By posting it, it is logical to assume, that you are using that as a justification for proof of citizenship.
Then, as soon as anybody points out the flaws to you, you duck and dive, and go in another direction - just like BHO - your story keeps on changing.
How about taking a specific stance and giving us the full monty of what you believe. No obfuscations. Think you can do that?
There will be those who suspect or know. Then there will be those directly linked to the conspiracy.
Kinda like cock roaches fleeing when the homeowner turns on the light. One or two get smacked, the rest run for cover.
Breitbart News has the right approach. If you say “See, he was born in Kenya and he’s not eligible” you won’t be taken seriously. But you say that the spirit of the requirement to be a native born American is not met because Obama feels his link to Kenya, was raised in Indonesia, and even when he did come back, living in Hawaii is quite separated from the mainland and was only recently a state when he was born. While he may be loyal to this country, he is not 100% “from here” and is more of a citizen of the world.
In the UK, universities often award “Certificates of Attendance” for foreign students, especially if they payed quickly and well. I knew a Saudi who did that. Do US schools do that too?
Andrew Breitbart left us knowing more than he had time to disclose to us.
What did he know that we need to re-discover, document and publish?
Why are ALL of Obama’s important early documents forged?
Where was Obama during his “Lost Years?”
Why are there so few known Obama childhood friends?
How many of Obama’s childhood buddies are still alive?
Was Obama a FOREIGN student at Occidental, Columbia or Harvard?
Who wrote the checks for Obama’s education?
Where these question that Andrew Beitbart knew some of the answers to?
____________
To tie the above with some speculative food for thought, please indulge me, (but DO ponder the speculations), as I re-post one of my recently updated comments as follows:
A dictator, such as Obama, only has the power that the people give him.
Currently, at least 40 % of polled American voters are gladly willing to give Obama the necessary power to continue his arrogant dictatorship.
About 47 % of American voters pay NO Personal Federal Income Taxes. These voters are the “fair share” voter base for Dictator Obama. We, in the 53 %, then are paying this 47 % to vote for Obama by virtue of us paying taxes for ourselves AND them.
In this manner we are supporting the voters who vote for Obama, and they will vote to do so again in November.
Dictator Obama has designed Obama”care” to become active only AFTER he is to be re-elected, thus enabling THE NINE SUPREMES to delay ruling on the Constitutionality of the dictate of the individual mandate until Obama is once again the Illegal Foreign White House Occupier, (IFWHO).
The purpose of Dictator Baby-Doc Barack is simple: 1.) Regulate; 2.) Control; and 3.) Destroy. By his own count he has already achieved 60 % of his goals, according to the note he says he carries in his pocket.
Obama’s obvious arrogant and deep hatred of America could have only come from what he was taught in his childhood.
Since there are no known networks of childhood friends from Obama’s past, Obama was probably a member of a Marxist sleeper cell funded by wealthy men with a Marxist view of the World.
The lack of credible documents that has NOT been forged requires a long-term, highly skilled and well-funded support group.
Who the key members of Obama’s probable support group and probable sleeper cell were and are is well known to the Interpol, CIA and the FBI.
Will “Citizen Journalists” such as Breitbart Editor Joel Pollack be able to out-spy the latter two US tax-funded spy entities?
BTW, forget about the LAM, (Liberal Agenda Media), as they are saving their notes to write their tell-all Obama books after Obama has SAFELY retired back home in Kenya.
BTW, BTW, to all the doubters of the above speculations: what does your gut tell you?
______________________
The questions we ask
Are simple to say,
One wonders why they
Were not asked,
Back in the Day?
Meanwhile, the drumbeat of Dictator, (in his own mind), Obama grows louder:
regulate —— control —— destroy —— Regulate —— control —— destroy —— REgulate —— control —— destroy —— REGulate —— control —— destroy —— REGU
The Shady Bunch ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kh6nJuPd3SM&feature=related
If it was a simple misunderstanding back then, as the literary agent now claims, what are the odds Obama would find it necessary to produce a counterfeit birth certificate now? Something to ponder for those who aren’t sure whether Hussein was lying then or now.
something the main media will not show America ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1qiu8hRZGs&feature=related
You seem to have a chip on your shoulder. I have made my views quite clear. I believe Obama's eligibility to be President needs to go before the courts and resolved. This is not only about Obama, but the millions of anchor babies and children of legal immigrants (green card holders) that have been born in this country.
There are 40 million immigrants in this country. One in 8 residents of this country is foreign born, the highest it has been in 90 years. By 2050 one in 5 residents will be foreign born. We also have 50 million visitors to the US annually. Birth tourism is an industry. The sooner we can resolve thru the courts the definition of natural born citizen as it relates to the Constitutional eligibility to be President the better.
I also have a personal interest. I believe strongly that the children of American citizens born overseas should be considered natural born. Many of them are the children of US military and diplomatic personnel. And there are also millions of Americans working oveseas in the private sector. They also have children born abroad. Although they are automatically US citizens under the law, it has not been resolved that they are considered NBC for the purposes of eligibility for the President.
Lawrence Tribe and Ted Olson responding to a request from the Senate in 2008 to give their opinion on the eligibility of John McCain to run for President found that he was because he was born of two US citizens. That seems to be a bone of contention on this thread. Just another reason to have SCOTUS address this issue sooner rather than later.
Bill Cosby speaking ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGqlrVmVULc&feature=related
Yeah, Yale Law School isn’t in the U.S. Idiot.
You are either a clown who can’t read at a fourth-grade level or you have not actually read the Minor Case (apart from that snippet that keeps getting quoted out of context.
Thanks! The eyewitness reported seeing Breitbart’s face turn “bright red” before he collapsed. A bright red flush is indicative of cyanide poisoning...
The definition in Minor v. Happersett was cited specifically to satisfy what the term means in Article II Sec. I. It was key to the court’s rejection of Virginia Minor’s argument of being a 14th amendment citizen. In effect, they admitted she could run for president even though she had no right to vote. By contrast, Obama can vote but he’s not Constitutionally eligible for the office he occupies.
Yale, the island of Maexism?
No, it’s definitely not in the US!
Explains your hatred of the protections written into our constitution though.
Everyone has let that lying bastard get away with everything for his entire life. I think it is actually a shock to him when someone tells him "no."
I put no stock in the writings of people when they are so much at odds with my own understanding of an issue. I simply regard them as having an agenda and therefore not worth looking at.
Suit yourself. I read things and then I know what they say.
They always selectively come out the closet...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.