Posted on 04/25/2012 10:29:58 AM PDT by cowboybeebop
Interesting. I was unfamiliar with the gyrojets. But a lot of 1960s technology failed solely because they lacked more advanced materials. I imagine if a similar system was tried today it would likely have a lot more success.
I know that the XM-25 grenade launcher and rounds are pretty astounding in either offense or defense. Not a weapon I would want to go up against. Lots of rave reviews from Afghanistan. When I first heard of the 25mm grenade I was very skeptical, comparing them with the old classic 40mm which I was quite fond of.
Something like that mounted on a UAV, maybe even a larger round, could be a real nightmare against surface forces.
1. It took a couple of feet to accelerate to speed, so a hand placed against the muzzle could stop a round.
2. Inaccurate at distance. Groups reported of 8 inches at 10 yards.
3. Expensive to produce ammunition.
It is possible that to-days technology could overcome these issues, but it is hard to beat conventional ammo.
Your idea of something like 25mm grenades launched from a UAV has promise.
Heh, heh! Love your graphics!
Hey, thanks Smoothsailing!
But I’m sure he had a blast trying it.
I still think it’s very doable. Precision computer controlled motion stabilization has reached amazing heights, well within reach of the hobbyist. I’m sure a bunch of people are inspired to try it now, and we’ll see hyperventilating news stories about the results in a few months.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.