Posted on 04/20/2012 4:25:55 AM PDT by Kaslin
All the big dogs were wiped out ~ literally.
The cause of the housing problem is OVERBUILDING. That was made possible through the illegal importation of MILLIONS OF LATIN AMERICAN laborers who worked for 20% of base wage.
The root cause has been and continues to be non-enforcement of our immigration laws.
“next rounder of foreclosures is expected to hit in may,”
This is good news for some of us. As someone who is trying to buy a home, I sacrificed for years to save money for a time like this.
If you prepare for the future, times like this can be a gold mine. But you can’t live for the moment. Getting ahead is more about planning ahead than anything else.
Follow the....
http://www.campaignmoney.com/finance.asp?type=in&cycle=08&criteria=pritzker&fname=penny
Billionaire business mogul Penny Pritzker is a member of one of Americas richest families and was the Finance Chair for the presidential campaign of Barack Obama. It was Pritzker that led the prolific, and illegal, fundraising that helped power Barack Obamas presidential campaign. She was the chair of Chicago-based Superior Banks board for five years. Pritzker was into subprime lending before it became all the rage starting in around 2000. Prtizker's chairmanship was to concentrate on sub prime lending, principally on home mortgages, but for a while in subprime auto lending, too, after the Pritzkers' bank acquired its wholesale mortgage organization division, Alliance Funding, in December 1992. Superior Bank went belly up in 2001 with over $1 billion in insured and uninsured deposits; 1,406 depositors lost much of their life savings. This collapse came amid harsh criticism of how Superiors owners promoted sub-prime home mortgages. |
[snip]
how does that work ??? so long as mcmansions continue to sell and make money for the developers, and the resulting tax base, whose going to stop it ???
further up the food chain in the political/finance trap is where wealth gets destroyed without being noticed...Im almost ready for hyperinflation, so that i get the mortgage paid off with those inflated dollars...
for the price of a couple cheeseburgers in new money, the house will be secured under the old contract, *unless* that contract is voided by new political/finance regs, of course ???...heheheheh...
we-r-screwed, actually, WERE screwed long ago, and a lil lobbying and ballot box initiative seems too little, too late...
What amazes me is that homeowners dont get together and form a political union to slow new housing development when house prices are going down.
**
Agreed. This is the problem where we live. Zillions of homes in forclosure,yet they just keep throwing up new fab homes and townhomes, further clogging the SAME roads we all use.
Our renters who were thinking of buying our underwater house from us just decided to move into one of these new homes. Of course, they are younger and want that brand new home instead of one that might need a little remodeling, but is in a much better neighborhood and location.
But, noooooo — they’ve just got to have that “new house” smell.
But, that’s ok. We’re moving back in it, we’re going to keep it up, and we’re going to hang onto it, come hell or high water. It’s ours, and it’s our investment. Someday we’ll recoup, I’m hoping.
Right , and the spending required to support those new developments is larger than those increases in tax base requiring even higher local taxes which the clueless sheep go along with, hostages of the resulting traffic jams and crowded schools that they seem to have no idea why things changed for the worst.
I used to propose passing a significant development tax on developers per acre that would be passed on to new houses price which would slow this process, instead of my taxes always going up. But they wont do it. Why?
1) Affordable house a priority goal of politicians even more than Green and current homeowners are clueless to how it hurts them.
2) Gives More representation in congress, even if they are illegals
3) NEW Voting base become MORE liberal and more accepting of taxes and spending.
To #3, when I moved here my county was solidly Republican, last year Dems in charge added ‘gender identity’ to the housing and employment discrimination laws. That will tell you what development did.
One thing I don't see noted here is INFLATION. Anyone remembering jimmeee cawter also remembers hyper-inflation. So someday, when obamination inflation really hits, it'll be like the days when people who bought huge estates in the 1960's for (I kid you not) $50,000, were paying less for their mortgage in inflated currency than most RENTERS.
The problem is to keep property taxes out of the inflation picture, as prop 13 did in kalifornica, briefly though, it seems. Moonbeam Brown is going to take that one away pronto.
Barring property taxes to infinity, holding on to a house may be ok, if hyper-inflation is not too high a price.
Imagine an electric bill of $7000 and a house payment of $1,900. Don't think about gasoline...
“What amazes me is that homeowners dont get together and form a political union to slow new housing development when house prices are going down”
I DID NOT KNOW THERE WERE SOCIALISTS ON FREEREPUBLIC.
Are you kidding me ?
Just because I am not a robot brain dead corporatist does not make me a socialist.
My taxes have gone up many times to support all the $$$ the developers have been making ruining our county and lowing our house prices.
Socialize that!
Your developer friends have turned my county from solid conservative to solid liberal.
Here in Virginia we tap developers for the cost of roads ~ you, as a buyer, pay that.
We continue to suffer from years of neglect where local politicians imagined that if they didn't build roads that would stop development in its track.
BTW, that doesn't work at all. You end up with massive development and 2 lane pea gravel and tar roads.
For decades I’ve said that you buy a house to build a home not for an investment. The claims it is a good investment have always been a myth for the most part. Not much more than a tax break sponsored enforced minor savings program and money laundering scheme for the money changers.
Look back at the housing price indices... housing has almost always gone up at the rate of inflation and from that you need to deduct the interest and the taxes and the upkeep. Sure, it is true you are paying back “old” money with inflated dollars, that is part of the deal.
Buy a house to make a home not as an investment.
“but was never sustainable by the sheer demographics.”
The demographics are exactly what sustaines the market long term. For example, our population is growing from 300 million. People need to live somewhere. Therefore, we will always need new housing. On the average most economists state we need to build 1,4 million NEW homes every year just to keep up with population growth of 300 million. Plus, houses need to be replaced every 75 years on the average(they burn down, tornados, floods,hurricanes,etc.).
However, our population is aging so more are moving into multifamily housing of some sort. Also, the southern part of the country is growing faster than the northern. Therefore, long term there will be more demand for housing in AZ & TX than there will be in MI & NY.
What we are in is still a correction from the biggest real estate boom EVER. Hence, the biggest correction ever. What people lost sight of is that real estate is a LONG TERM INVESTMENT. There were too many “Flip This House” purchases between 1999-2005. Also, all real estate is local. The Washington, DC metro area had about a 15% correction in real estate values. Phoenix, LA & Miami had substantially more.
What was not sustainable were the unprecidented increase in real estate values and the volume(2 million) that was built. What we are slowly going back to is a normal real estate market that grows 6% a year on the average and you need to put 20% down. However, some areas like Phoenix are up substantially from the bottom because it has attracted investors buying houses to rent out and snowbirds buying retirement homes from the north, especially Canada. This is also happening in Florida too, where Quebecers are flying down to buy because of the favorable exchange rate.
You need to learn how to figure out their motives.
The Dem in charge of my county during the peak development years that he supported fully said the same thing, that building roads just encourages more development, all while he supported tens of thousands of new houses being built here..
That argument makes no sense, it's like saying the cart pulls the horse.
The reason why these libs encourage massive development without the required road work is to build voters support for public transportation at taxpayer expense, the LAST THING I WANT HERE.
You're a genius.
The motive behind "development" is not the same as that behind roads.
In reality we had a very steep 50% adjustment!
We recovered some of that before too terribly many people went belly up. My own neighborhood had a 30% foreclosure rate ~ fairly typical for DC's Virginia suburbs BTW. We've recovered to the price levels seen in 2005.
Our Hispanics are being rapidly replaced by legal Russian immigrants (most of whom have been here 10 or more years).
What we have done in my town to slow growth is we have voted to give the town conservation commision a $5 million bond to be used to buy up available land so that developers can not build new subdivisions.
“What was not sustainable were the unprecidented increase in real estate values and the volume(2 million) that was built.”
That was my point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.