Posted on 04/11/2012 2:45:48 PM PDT by Arthurio
Scary website.
All as Corey pandered to minorities and race baiters on a national level.
Not enough?
It was followed by professional leftist, Blank Panthers and other applauding black racist!
She all but winked and nodded to her media fans and government co-workers during her speech, while attempting to control her glee.
This was Corey's Political Awards moment. Describing it as disgusting, would be an understatement.
Mad magazine should do a cover of her speech.
Do not presume to speak for me again. You are wrong on several counts. And why would you presume to speak for me and to whom are you announcing this? And why?? Stop. You completely missed the points.
I did not see all of her speech. Her speech is neither here nor there for me. What she does in court is what matters. Do not ever put me in any category that supports the black panthers. You do not know me from Adam’s housecat. And I have no idea what you equate with pandering to race baiters or....what are you saying???? You are saying she was pandering to minorities? What????? Stop. And why would you use the word whore for a professional Special Prosecutor? You are just wrong on so many points.
Nobody will win if the “stupid people” take to the streets...
Whats funny, maybe more sad than anything, is that is what they’ve been wanting for a long time...
Check out this dance number.
Do you have any understanding of restorative justice?
Jury instructions don’t mean a thing if the jury is already politicized by the media, which they already are. I don’t think that you could find 12 people in the whole country who have not heard that Trayvon Martin was a young black boy that looked like he could have been Obama’s son.
Interesting, but when you state: “2. The death was caused by the criminal act of the defendant: Again, obvious. Zimmerman shot Martin, which caused his death”
There is nothing from what we know, no facts we are aware, to state the shooting was criminal in nature. Just allegations but no proof and the prosecution offers none.
Shooting someone in self-defense to repel a home invasion, for example, or shooting someone to save your life (in fear of your life or the life of another) most certainly is not a criminal act. So, just because someone shot someone is not by itself a criminal act. Therefore, element #2 is not proved as the state offers no proof at this time to prove he acted unlawfully when the thug was shot.
I suggest the state has no facts to prove beyond a reasonable doubt element #2 was a criminal act.
Element 3, that would need to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt and if not proved then element #2 most certainly is a non-issue.
The state has to prove all three elements and I think even Ray Charles can see the state is over-charging and has no chance of a Murder 2 conviction. It is all for show.
I have more understanding of same than you know. There is nothing wrong with the jury knowing Trayvon was a young man. Zimmerman’s atty has said everyone is aware of the tragedy and the fact someone lost a son. He knows what he is doing. You do not demonize Trayvon. That would be a huge mistake. And the atty is sincere. That was not calculated.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.