Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/28/2012 10:40:42 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Servant of the Cross

You are all dreaming. This is the chance for USG to take over health care.

You may be sure that the supremes are getting strongly coached on; likely threatened.

As soon as USAians allowed/requested USG to provide health care for thermselves, as in Medicare, they were setting up for a calamity. As this beaucracy (inevitably) grew huger and huger, the day would arrive that it started crushing USG budget, which would _force_/enable USG to seize the whole thing.

Let’s face facts, our Chinese debtors are no longer interested in funding USA health care. Nor should they have to.


55 posted on 03/28/2012 12:05:51 PM PDT by veracious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Servant of the Cross; Morgana; null and void; writer33

Is anyone else starting to think we are being played??


58 posted on 03/28/2012 12:21:51 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Servant of the Cross

And yet, the health insurance market which this law seeks to regulate is specifically NOT interstate. In fact, insurance companies are specifically barred from selling policies across state lines.


59 posted on 03/28/2012 12:26:56 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Servant of the Cross
Hmph. So, what is this a 3 year exercise in how to waste everyone's time - brought to you by the constitutional scholar* - Barack Hussein Obama (mm mmmm mm) - what a freaking joke this clown is. No resume, no work experience, not qualified to shovel shate in a horse barn and this is the toad the democrats chose to install as a US chief executive? Are you kidding me?

and just think, John McCain lost to this two bit, race baiting jackwagon. Haha.

60 posted on 03/28/2012 12:27:05 PM PDT by atc23 (The Confederacy was the single greatest conservative resistance to federal authority ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Servant of the Cross

If it does go down. It won’t be close. It’ll could be unanimous. Lots of people are signaling that the election would go better for everyone if it was struck down. Kagan is now a Justice. It no longer matters how she got there, she can’t be removed because she didn’t play ball with Obama. Sotomayer too. History isn’t going to judge them on whether they carried water for Obama, but on whether women on the bench was good for the country. I was shocked at the EPA decision being unanimous.

If it really is an absurd anti-constitutional monstrosity, they all may kill it. Passed the way it was passed, it was a very killable bill. Scalia even joked as to whether he would be required to read all 2700 pages in order to rule on it.

I’m curious as to whether the minority would have to write an opinion if it does go down 8-1 or 7-2. I’m not sure they do.


63 posted on 03/28/2012 12:35:45 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs (Does beheading qualify as 'breaking my back', in the Jeffersonian sense of the expression?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Servant of the Cross

A mandate is merely a dictate. Thus, if we are dictated to, do we then live under a Dictatorship?

If our freedom of choice is taken from us by the dictates of a hostile Federal government, then what Liberty do we have left?


65 posted on 03/28/2012 1:01:11 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Servant of the Cross

Yet admin still confident of constitutionality. The commies don’t intend on giving in - regardless.


67 posted on 03/28/2012 1:14:48 PM PDT by Heart of Georgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Servant of the Cross

Don’t get your hopes up.

The Supremes are past masters at faking it and misleading observers during the oral arguments.

They are not going to sink America’s first black president so will find ways to rationalize acceptance of all or most of Obamacare.

They might throw conservatives a small bone and declare one minor provision unconstitutional, but the act itself will stand.


68 posted on 03/28/2012 1:17:45 PM PDT by Iron Munro (If Repub's paid as much attention to Rush Limbaugh as the Dem's do, we wouldn't be in this mess)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Servant of the Cross

I thought the 2700 page bill was written with NO CHANGES—NO AMENDMENTS, etc.

It won’t matter if it is 2700 pages....
270 pages .....
or 27 pages.

As long as Obama & Reid & Pelosi are running things, we will be screwed with whatever they pass.


77 posted on 03/28/2012 2:37:38 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Servant of the Cross
An interesting point to ponder is the way that Obama lectured the justices of SCOTUS during a State of the Union address . . .
If the justices think about that disrespect, they might be more inclined to go whole hog. In for a penny, in for a pound . . .

78 posted on 03/28/2012 5:41:28 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (DRAFT PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson