Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trayvon Martin Killing: Friend Tells ABC News Howls on 911 Tapes Belong to Zimmerman, Not Martin
ABC News ^ | Saturday March 24, 2012 | Matt Gutman and Olivia Katrandjian

Posted on 03/24/2012 9:51:42 PM PDT by kristinn

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-165 last
To: okie01
Ok. I was unsure of the reasons you had pinged me. I agree with your statements and questions. And yes - you know it's coming - please don't call me Shirley.

:)

161 posted on 03/25/2012 7:04:06 PM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: okie01
There is confusion in this case between the terms "stand your ground," and "self defense." The "Stand Your Ground" statute in Florida defines the right of self defense where a dwelling is involved. In this case, there was no issue of Zimmerman defending himself in relation to any dwelling, so the "Stand Your Ground" law has no bearing. As I explained to others, even Zimmerman's lawyer has publicly stated that this is not a "Stand Your Ground" case. He said it is a "self defense" case.

Here is a link to the Florida Statute:

Title XLVI CRIMES

Chapter 776

JUSTIFIABLE USE OF FORCE

View Entire Chapter
776.013 Home protection; use of deadly force; presumption of fear of death or great bodily harm.

http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0700-0799/0776/Sections/0776.013.html

162 posted on 03/25/2012 7:53:24 PM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
Agreed. The issue is not "stand your ground". Instead, it is "self-defense".

In fact, I'm wondering who identified it as a "stand your ground" case in the first place.

Somebody had to make it a public issue -- if Jeb Bush felt called upon to deny that it fit the definition. And it certainly spawned a liberal movement to "repeal stand your ground laws".

Yet, it clearly doesn't apply to the case.

163 posted on 03/25/2012 8:23:49 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Excellent observation. Liberals clearly don’t like the “Stand Your Ground” law, and are deliberately using this case to try to weaken it!


164 posted on 03/25/2012 8:33:41 PM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: TheZMan

I wish it were so. I keep thinking if things get even worse than it is in this country, so many will have to see the light and admit they were wrong. Some are so brain dead/washed, they would never be able to admit they are wrong. Some are so prideful they would never admit it. Some are so deceitful and hateful they would never admit it. Some have an agenda like Obama and Sharpton that they will never admit it. Just like this case. It won’t happen. I’m hoping it will peter out once the steam is released—that’s if we are lucky.


165 posted on 03/25/2012 11:38:49 PM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-165 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson