[hoosiermama]

Shame that a big buck contributor couldn’t run a five to one campaign in the remaining states against Willard using this material.

[Georgia Girl 2]

What happened to “I’m severely conservative?”

[Yaelle]

Mitt Romney is a phony!! He won’t even be that great for the economy!

If we want to stop him, we have to vote Santorum.

Paul or Gingrich do not stand a chance.

VOTE SANTORUM. There isn’t much time left!!!

[Washi]

Wow. This is from Glenn Beck's favorite news site, The Blaze?

How did a story critical of Romney sneak past?

[Vaquero]

[SSS Two]

My state doesn’t have party registration. Evidently, Mitt Romney is more of a Republican than I am. What credentials do we need to see?

[TSgt]

Just need to change McCain to Romney.

[MacMattico]

Not trying to defend Romney, but the truth is try running for dog catcher up here in parts of the northeast as a Republican. If you even use the word conservative, you'll lose by more then 20%. In a couple of small towns around here, we have conservative “democrat” mayors because a group of republicans banded together, changed party affiliation, and voted in the democrat caucus for the conservative republican “turned democrat”. Some may say this isn't right or is unethical, but it was live under a small town dictatorship or take some unorthodox action. As you can see, the democrats were so stupid they were just voting for the “D”, didn't even know who the candidate was. Every other article on Free republic is about how horrible Obama is. If we can win both houses, and Romney picks a decent VP, I would vote for him. We will hold his feet to the fire. I believe his appointments, the people he surrounds himself with, etc would be far better then 4 more years of Obama.

[Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears]

See tagline.

[NavVet]

Not on Drudge! What a shock.

[conservativebabe]

THIS, this right here is why no one trusts this guy. We all know he’s not a conservative and it’s why he will be little better than Obama.

How can he run against Obama with the constant barrage of crap like this coming out?

This country is in deep doo doo if he gets the nom because he will surely lose to Obama. Why don’t people see that?

[GraceG]

The Problem as I see it with Romney is that he will be such a mediocre President that even if he does win he will be so middle of the road as to “not upset the apple cart” that the economy will not bloom and then in 4 years it will assure that the democrats take back power on the whole meme that the “economy didn’t recover”.

Not to mention any GOP president is going to be so damned hated no matter how “moderate” they are. Mittens will get so damned gun shy that he will be ineffective and the MSM and the Democrat controlled media will smell blood and keep attacking him even as he retreats and this will paralyze him to what needs to be done to restore the economy and defuse all of Obama’s horrible regulatory actions.

Newt is going to be hated like hell anyways and HE KNOWS THAT, but he also knows that he will have the people who put him there behind even if the Media doesn’t paint it that way every night at 5:00pm.

So therefore, Newt (who thrives on antagonism instead of flinching from it) will take the bold measures to recover the economy despite being thrashed every night on the MSM news channels. In Four years the MSM will be flabbergasted like their were on election night in 1984, because the man on the street will notice the economy improvement.

Mitt is a Flincher, Newt is a Clincher

Definition of a Clincher:

a decisive fact, argument, act, or remark

Definition of a Flincher:

to withdraw or shrink from or as if from pain

We are so SOL if Either Mittens gets in or Barry gets a second term.

Mittens would only slow things down and then in four years the GOP would be blamed so much but with little to show we would still be in an economic malaise the likes of Carter’s worst dreams. This would GUARANTEE a Democrat Victory over the house the senate and even the presidency in 2016. They would not be pulling any punches as they would run someone that would make Obama look like a middle of the road moderate. Because they know they would have a very good chance of winning. Not to mention the class warfare game that could be played to Bolshevik conclusion during that election if we get Romney and mediocre performance out of him which is very much likely.

Of course Obama winning would be a very much “nothing to lose” second term that would see him likely either completely destroying the economy so badly that they play the game of “Destroy and Support” in that they would destroy the economy and then support the people as the “great savior” thus ensuring either “Glorious Revolution” or the mass construction project of making millions more so dependent that they will have a permanent grip on power that would only come undone with Blood sweat and tears, but mostly Blood and Tears.

ABO and ABR, because we really need Newt or maybe Santorum if we get desperate, heck I would even take, heaven forbid (I can’t believe I am saying this), Ron Paul over Romney for the reasons above.

So I repeat once more: Newt is the Clincher, and Mitt is the Flincher.

[plain talk]

Well the Republicans in Massachusetts are RINOs so distancing oneself from them isn’t necessarily bad in and of itself. So here we have one RINO (Romney) distancing himself from other RINOs. yawn

[RedMDer]

Quote Link “In the wake of the devastating Detroit riots of the summer of 1967, Michigan Gov. George Romney, a liberal Republican, met the radical organizer Saul Alinsky to discuss the grievances of the urban black poor,” he explained.

Photos of the meeting can be found in the archives of the Library of Congress.

Kaczynski noted that a book on George Romney quotes the former Michigan governor telling his allies, “I think you ought to listen to Alinsky.”

Political analyst and think-tank researcher Steve Baldwin believes that Mitt Romney was definitely impacted by his father’s association with Alinsky.

[AlanGreenSpam]

Watch the clip closely:

Romney was trying to distance himself from the incumbent Republican machine in that election in Massachusetts.

Reagan wasn’t “chummy” with the Republican Party either. He was a loner, guided by strong principles.

Romney may not have as strong principles, but he is an odd loner type who doesn’t hang with the party bosses to curry favor. He got a lot of money, so he doesn’t need the “machine” for money.

So I don’t take this video to mean that Romney is saying “I’m not a Republican” even though on many counts one could say so on his record.