Posted on 03/20/2012 9:36:58 PM PDT by marktwain
Getting into a fight means nothing. Most youths, of all races, gets into at least one fight over the course of their schooling.
Most Freepers here advocate the willingness to fight, if you’re being picked on.
Maybe it’s not an agenda, but the simple truth.
Thanks for the advice, that happens to me all the time. People follow me and approach ggod to know that I can unload on them. Get real.
It's an alternate theory and equally as valid.
I have seen some people claim this but I think it is almost certainly not true. The 911 calls have been made public. If Zimmerman had made a racial slur this would be mentioned in the first paragraph of every story out there.
If they play up the Hispanic angle, that could cause Hispanics to rally to Zimmerman's side, especially any Hispanics who have anti-black attitudes. We could be heading for "mob justice" as activists whip up emotions because of Trayvon Martin's death--having two angry mobs confronting each other won't make things better.
You mean, other than beating the hell out of the Neighborhood Watch guy...
You say this as if the fight just happened. Somebody started the fight. Maybe it was Trayvon.
And why does a gated community have a neighborhood watch wandering about in the dark with guns? Don't they have a gate?
Do you see the problem here? Unless we visit the site via Google.Earth we don't know ~ I do, but you don't. Right now I'm trying to site the specific 7/11 he visited.
Watch how Zimmerman's location is always cited as "his neighborhood" ~ not a specific townhouse development but "neighborhood". Why is that? Doesn't he live there?
Really? Are you serious?
Kid is walking home with some skittles and tea, that he bought at local convenience store. There is nothing to suggest the kid was up to anything more than that.
Zimmerman notices the kid and phones the operator and tells the operator explicitly that he wasn’t going to let the kid get away and gets out of his vehicle to confront the kid.
And you still don’t know who likely attacked first?
The law defines first contact of any sort as attacking. So much as a touch on the body is defined as an attack. How many kids, when confronted by a man with a gun are going to throw the first punch?
The person iniating aggressive contact is always considered the attacker. It’s unlikely that an unarmed kid is going to be the one to initiate aggressive contact with somebody with a gun.
Many presume the law was written for the sole purpose of protecting gunowners from legal repercussions if they end up shooting some bad guy. Actually, this law protects unarmed victims from guys with guns as well. They don't have to stand there and take it. If they feel in fear for their lives they can mount a resistance using any means feasible.
That much is obvious. What is less obvious is why you have so much faith that the MSM is objective, accurate, and unbiased. This, despite the decades of evidence to the contrary...
Unless Zimmerman was carrying it in a hip holster, it's unlikely the yute knew he had a gun.
That’s right, he has a right to watch. That’s what security guards do, observe and report.
He was told to stand down and not do anything else beyond that. He choose to confront the perp anyway.
There is no credible defense in this situation.
Is this the new modus in the US
The Justice Dept doesn’t like how a case is resolved so they step in.
Nuts...birthed in the 50s and 60s and now the Holder gang is making hay of it.
man what a mess
“If you get out of that car and approach me ~ that’s all I need. YOU HAVE NO BUSINESS getting inside my comfort zone.”
**********************************************************
This whole thing seems to be very emotional for you. Perhaps I’m misreading this but, if what you’re inferring is that if someone on a neighborhood watch is following you then you will physically attack that person if they “get in your comfort zone”, you might want to consider whether an “anger management” course could be helpful.
I think very few folks here are defending the entirety of Zimmerman’s actions—he clearly displayed bad judgement and immaturity. His actions are troubling to me. As for me, I’m waiting for all the facts to come out before I render final judgment on this.
You skipped some steps, Ace.
Well, that whole getting the crap kicked out of him thing might be a defense. Especially if you look at his narrative, listen to the released 911 tapes, and take into account the defensive wounds Zimmerman reportedly suffered.
Or... You can just take the MSM/CBC narrative and stick to it despite any contradictory witness info...
You can reject the whole internet if you want, because that’s what every site is saying. If you look at the kid’s pictures, it’s well apparent that he’s not a well-muscled 250 lb person or something.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.