Thomas Sowell: Gingrich Is the Only One Who Can Debate Obama

FoxNews ^ | March 10, 2012 | Thomas Sowell

[Marguerite]

“Here is Breitbart’s first mention of the only presidential candidate named in his, “The Vetting, Part I: Barack’s Love Song To Alinsky.”

“The reason Newt Gingrich surged in the Republican primary contest in January is that he was attempting to do the press’s job by finding out who the current occupant of the White House actually is. Millions also want to know, but the mainstream media is clearly not planning to vet the President anytime soon. Quite the opposite.”

And here is his article’s conclusion:

“Because the mainstream media did not explore his roots, the American public remains largely ignorant of the degree to which Obama’s work with ACORN and his love of Alinsky were symbolic of his true political will.

If any of the candidates can resist the media, and parlay Newt’s strategy into a nomination, we’ll have the choice between an imperfect but well-known Republican and the real “Baraka” Obama, not the manufactured one the media prefers.”

http://gulagbound.com/27137/internet-activists-fight-like-breitbart-and-dont-make-a-mitt-stake/

[Marguerite]

Read more here:

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/03/09/romney-brushes-up-on-his-southern-slang-in-preparation-for-dixie-primaries/

[true believer forever]

what is really so patently dishonest about this is, you hear conservative republicans saying all the time, republicans lost their way, bought into DC big money ways, yada yada, that’s why they lost. And then they come along and excuse Santorum - Rush and Levin and many others - well, he had to support his President, he had to protect his President, yada yada. In other words, it’s only a mistake or lapse when someone they don’t like does it, otherwise it’s perfectly excusable and understandable. I am starting to believe there is a conservative media just as compromised and unprincipled as the liberal media, only of course they try to look holy..

[true believer forever]

Three debates are practicaly an institution now, and they most likely will happen, even if Gingrich is the nominee. I think Obama will be forced into them, like it or not.

And even if Obama decided just to blow them off, there are ways to handle that and Newt himself has addressed that issue by referring to the way Lincoln shadowed Douglas, who at first refused to debate.

You are absolutely right. Newt will make it work for him in a grand grand way - whether barack debates him or not. No one seems to be considering this - barack is egotistical enough that he doesn't see Newt as a threat at all, and will welcome the debates. he is just so deep-seed egotistical he could think that... hope no one talks him down off the roof.

[fr_freak]

OK, a couple of other easy things you can try for your mouse problem:

Since your mouse is cordless, try moving the mouse receiver away from any devices on the desktop. For example, if you have the receiver sitting near the keyboard, or speakers, or joystick, etc. especially if the other device is between the receiver and where you normally hold the mouse. Also, don't put your cellphone near the mouse or receiver. Try a few different positions for the mouse receiver.

If that has no effect, try unplugging all your other non-essential devices. I'm going to assume your mouse receiver is USB, so you can start with unplugging other USB devices that you don't need on a daily basis, just to see if there is some kind of conflict.

[no dems]

“What can we do to stop him and Rick from splitting the Conservative vote”

A decisive Gingrich win in the South.

____________________________________________________________
SPOT ON!!!