Skip to comments.
Ohio Supreme Court sends Castle Doctrine case of Carl Kozlosky back to trial court
cleveland.com ^
| 2 February, 2012
| Pat Galbincea
Posted on 02/03/2012 11:39:42 AM PST by marktwain
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
To: TexasRedeye
Because 18 wasn’t enough to stop the threat, and 20 would have been more than necessary.
21
posted on
02/03/2012 2:52:49 PM PST
by
Secret Agent Man
(I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
To: marktwain
States and municipalities have to be liable for all costs and attorney fees in these castle doctrine / home cases.
the case NEVER should have been brought.
since prosecutors will not learn, then they should be forced to pay out of their budgets until they learn.
22
posted on
02/03/2012 2:54:59 PM PST
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Pollster1
Sounds like a T.E.D. ......
Threat elimination drill.
23
posted on
02/03/2012 4:00:15 PM PST
by
mormonsniper
(If my flag annoys you, you are the enemy.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson