Posted on 01/08/2012 9:30:41 AM PST by Kaslin
Did I miss the role Obama took even though he was listed in the headline??? Trillion upons trillions spent, frittered away.
The fallacies of the last three Presidents, Clinton, Bush, and Obama, came together to cause the devastating financial crisis-——————
What role did Obama play? Nothing mentioned...
Ann Barnhardt...without teleprompter. Best 40 minutes (and scariest) youll spend:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hGl3QPfB084
Then, watch Why No Brokerage Account Is Safe:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMI6JYX2e0Q&feature=relmfu
THEN, get your money OUT and take some TUMS.
Ann Barnard isn’t she the one to whom Corzine is linked?
She closed her brokerage firm BECAUSE of what Corzine did with MF Global.
She did it for the good of her clients because she believes there is 100% fraud in the market, and she’s telling everyone to get out.
Listen to the video...she admonishes everyone to buy guns, too.
To those who say “I can’t afford to lose the penalty for taking my money out”, she says they won’t have ANY money to take out if they don’t move quickly.
"Well, I'm glad my opponent brought up the economy. Mr. Obama, isn't your campaign's National Finance Chairwoman Penny Pritzker -- and didn't her Chicago Family-owned Superior Bank fail in 2001 from doing subprime loans for ACORN?"
Follow the....
http://www.campaignmoney.com/finance.asp?type=in&cycle=08&criteria=pritzker&fname=penny
Billionaire business mogul Penny Pritzker is a member of one of Americas richest families and was the Finance Chair for the presidential campaign of Barack Obama. It was Pritzker that led the prolific, and illegal, fundraising that helped power Barack Obamas presidential campaign. She was the chair of Chicago-based Superior Banks board for five years. Pritzker was into subprime lending before it became all the rage starting in around 2000. Prtizker's chairmanship was to concentrate on sub prime lending, principally on home mortgages, but for a while in subprime auto lending, too, after the Pritzkers' bank acquired its wholesale mortgage organization division, Alliance Funding, in December 1992. Superior Bank went belly up in 2001 with over $1 billion in insured and uninsured deposits; 1,406 depositors lost much of their life savings. This collapse came amid harsh criticism of how Superiors owners promoted sub-prime home mortgages. |
[snip]
Losses on subprime mortgage-backed securities didn't start shaking financial institutions until 2007,
Uhuh.
Arnall, paging the Godfather of Subpri... err, Ambassador Roland Arnall, please come to the White Hut courtesy phone....
Ping
The CRA and other government mandates didn’t cover Wall Street investment banks like Goldman Sachs, pure mortgage lenders like Ameriquest, nor hedge funds like John Paulson.
The IBs, pure mortgage lenders, and hedge funds cranked out trillions of dollars worth of subprime paper and derivatives, all in the private sector and all in competition with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. They did it without any government pressure. They did it because they were making a ton of money in the subprime market.
Peter Ferrara is perpetuating a politically convenient myth, that “the government caused it all”, which gets treated like Gospel around here because a lot of conservatives start with the belief that only government could do something so stupid and damaging, and the facts be damned if they indicate otherwise.
Well Wall Street spent a whole lot of money paying politicians of both stripes to dismantle the Glass Steagall act and to pass laws to prevent regulation of the derivatives industry. Google “GrammLeachBliley” and the “Commodities Futures Modernization Act of 2000”. The private shadow banking sector was in the subprime market up to their eyeballs, without government pressure, and they did a whole lot of stupid and destructive things, courtesy of their refusal to price risk correctly due to their idiotic belief in David X Li’s Gaussian Copula Function.
HUD and the CRA ought to be scrapped. But so should the claim that the government caused the crisis and that the lending business was simply an innocent victim of government regulation.
“Where’s RICO, LEOs?”
There may not be a way to prosecute the likes of Arnall. The shadow banking firms lobbied to keep themselves exempt from laws that cover banks.
There may not be a way to prosecute the likes of Arnall. The shadow banking firms lobbied to keep themselves exempt from laws that cover banks.
"Argent is safe from investigation because the government got their $325 million settlement from Ameriquest and won't be looking into Argent, per the settlement agreement. "
Dear Mr. Lee: I was previously employed by Argent Mortgage for two and a half years and managed, among other areas, the corporation's fraud investigation, borrower complaints and repurchase departments. There are currently over 568 open fraud investigations involving hundreds of brokers and hundreds of millions of dollars in fraudulent loans that are being covered up by top executives in the company. If a broker sustains a certain monthly volume, Argent management looks the other way and, not only does not suspend the bad brokers, but knowingly sells these fraudulent loans on the secondary market to unwitting investors.
I was terminated today and left with just my purse in tow, but I have names of individuals in the company who need to be served with subpoenas to enable them to turn over their spreadsheets and boxes full of documentation and evidence of all the fraud they have found that is being covered up by Argent Mortgage's executive management. The state regulators need to know the truth about the blind eye Argent turns to the fraud perpetrated on innocent consumers by high volume brokers. They also need to be aware that Argent knowingly bundles these fraudulent loans and sells them as mortgage-backed securities on Wall Street, thereby compromising the SEC, as well as our country's economic stability.
At a recent fraud seminar attended by hundreds of mortgage lenders in Washington D.C. a week ago, an attorney who works for Argent's retained law firm, Buchalter Nemer, stood up and told the seminar attendees that the wholesale lenders in the audience had better beware, unless their name is Argent. Argent is safe from investigation because the government got their $325 million settlement from Ameriquest and won't be looking into Argent, per the settlement agreement. I hope this isn't true because Argent Mortgage funded over $50 billion in 2005 and is gearing up to fund well over $80 billion dollars of fraudulent loans in 2007.
"We didn't truly know the dangers of the market, because it was a dark market," says Brooksley Born, the head of an obscure federal regulatory agency -- the Commodity Futures Trading Commission [CFTC] -- who not only warned of the potential for economic meltdown in the late 1990s, but also tried to convince the country's key economic powerbrokers to take actions that could have helped avert the crisis. "They were totally opposed to it," Born says. "That puzzled me. What was it that was in this market that had to be hidden?"
Yes, infuriating and not a surprise.
Argent and Ameriquest were two of the largest subprime houses. They are largely forgotten because Argent was a division of Ameriquest and was later gobbled up by Citigroup.
And Ameriquest is one of the All Stars over at the Mortgage Lender Implode O Meter, and therefore no longer exists.
Brooksley Born was one of the few heroic figures who tried to prevent the subprime mess, although her attempt to regulate the OTC derivatives market was defeated.
It wasn’t like every regulator refused to do their job, although I think that was certainly the case with Greenspan and Cox over at the SEC. There were state attorneys general who investigated subprime lending abuses but were prevented from doing anything about it.
Cox’s tenure at the SEC bought into the same idea that you posted about Greenspan, the belief that the financial markets would self-regulate.
That experiment sure worked out great. It took 60 some years to forget the lessons of the 1930s and to dismantle the separation of commercial and investment banking. Ten years for investment bankers to blunder into another major financial crisis.
[Ten years for investment bankers to blunder into another major financial crisis.]
And all of the above took place in the context of a culture that was being deliberately and systemically corrupted from within; culminating in the demoralized / amoral state of affairs where this...
"As a 19 then 20 year old boy, my managers and handlers taught me the ins and outs of mortgage fraud, drugs, sex, and money, money, and more money. My friend and manager handed out crystal methamphetamine to loan officers in a bid to keep them up and at work longer hours. At any given moment inside the restrooms - cocaine and meth was being snorted by my estimates more than a third of the staff, and more than half the staff manipulating documents to get loans to fund and more then 75% just completely made falses tatements on 1003s regarding stated income etc to get loans funded. "
"We are witnessing the consequences of a generation inculcated with moral relativity and situation ethics."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2184646/posts?page=12#12
That same generation inculcated with moral relativity and situation ethics has segued into The Entitlement Generation.
The new motto is “Pay Me—I’m a Victim.”
FOURTEEN TRILLION DOLLARS: Behind The Real Size of the Bailout; A guide to the abbreviations, acronyms, and obscure programs that make up the $14 trillion federal bailout of Wall Street
SOURCE motherjones.com
Mon Dec. 21, 2009 12:23 PM PST
The price tag for the Wall Street bailout is often put at $700 billionthe size of the Troubled Assets Relief Program. But TARP is just the best known program in an array of more than 30 overseen by Treasury Department and Federal Reserve that have paid out or put aside money to bail out financial firms and inject money into the markets.
To get a sense of the size of the real $14 trillion bailout, see our chart at web site. Below, a guide to the pieces of the puzzle:
Treasury Department bailout programs
(Remember that Obama's Treasury Dept was controlled by his then-COS Rahm Emanuel---a G/S lobbyist in the WH)
Money Market Mutual Fund: In September 2008, the Treasury announced that it would insure the holdings of publicly offered money market mutual funds. According to the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (SIGTARP), these guarantees could have potentially cost the federal government more than $3 trillion [PDF].
Public-Private Investment Fund: This joint Treasury-Federal Reserve program bought toxic assets from banks and brokeragesas much as $5 billion of assets per firm. According to SIGTARP, the government's potential exposure from the PPIF is between $500 million and $1 trillion [PDF].
TARP: As part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, the Treasury has made loans to or investments more than 750 banks and financial institutions. $650 billion has been paid out (not including HAMP; see below). As of December 21, 2009, $117.5 billion of that has been repaid.
Government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) stock purchase: The Treasury has bought $200 million in preferred stock from Fannie Mae and another $200 million from Freddie Mac [PDF] to show that they "will remain viable entities critical to the functioning of the housing and mortgage markets."
GSE mortgage-backed securities purchase: Under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, the Treasury may buy mortgage-backed securities from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. According to SIGTARP, these purchases could cost as much as $314 billion --- SNIP---.
LONG READ---go to web site to read more and checkout the shocking charts.
SOURCE http://motherjones.com/politics/2009/12/behind-real-size-bailout
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.