Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/28/2011 11:40:16 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: Kaslin
Ron Paul understands the the monetary system and its foundations in our Republic, and the budgetary requirements of this nation as well as anyone out there...and what he says and the policies he holds regarding them are spot on.

His foreign policy viza viz the Mid-East in particular (but also elsewhere) is dangerously short-sighted. The fact is, fundamental Islam has been at war with us for many, many years. They have attacked and killed our citizens and soldiers...long before 911. They did so in a spectacular fashion on 911 and we had a President in office who responded appropriately...getting authorization and approval from Congress (which IMHO passes constitutional muster) and took the fight to them.

Bush did it in a brilliant manner, taking on two enemies directly while completely isolating the third, larger enemy in Iran, having surrounded them on three sides (Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Arabian Sea). If Bush he had stayed in power...which he couldn't...or if we had elected someone with the same vision, then when the liberty bug and massive demonstrations occurred in Iran last year, he would have taken advantage of it and Iran would have fallen...with our help.

We should in fact avoid foreign entanglements as Paul states. but I define entannglements as things such as the UN and other involvements that are clouded and not in our best interest. OTOH, we should embrace treaties and economic agreements with friends and allies that enhance our interests.

If we were true to that, and to the true Free Market...and the principles that undergird it (like the same principles that undergird our constitution), we would be fine.

Anyhow, Paul adopting this posture that we are to blame for the Islamic attacks (we aren't) and that if we treat them better and allow them to have nukes they will then make nice with us...is, as I say, dangeroulsy misguided, even if his monetary and budgetary leanings are spot on.

Finally, I am not satisfied with how he answered the question about his newsletters. They went out under his name. By extension they are his views. He either knew what was going in there and tacitly approved of it...or he was complacant to the point of being foolish as others used his newsletter as a platform to make those very wong-headed remarks. He cannot have it both ways.

He should disavow them...but he should also admit that he was negligent in his oversite of the newsletter. Without that, we are really left to wonder whether he really did mostly go along with them, or question his ability to manage what his own news-releases and press might say.

61 posted on 12/28/2011 12:42:06 PM PST by Jeff Head (Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

This thread will show how well the MSM and RNC propaganda machines work. Yuri was correct.


75 posted on 12/28/2011 1:38:30 PM PST by algernonpj (He who pays the piper . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

This are a few ZOT worthy RUPaul supporters in need of Zotting on this thread ~

Unleash the Viking Kitteh


107 posted on 12/29/2011 7:13:19 AM PST by simplesimon (You are entitled to your own opinions but not your own "facts"...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson