Posted on 12/19/2011 2:00:04 PM PST by lbryce
Check Newt’s voting record. He is a NWO/CFR globalist who supports amnesty and the global warming lie. Anyone except Huntsman is better than Newt. Newt is as bad or worse than McCain or Graham-nesty.
“Check Newts voting record.” I guess you missed the welfare reform, the 4 years of balanced budgets, the tax cuts. You know, the Contract With America?
NO, and maybe you should look back at my comments on why I wouldn’t vote for Romeny before asking a dumb question...I don’t think Jim allows Romney voters here, do you?
True
True
Truth is truth no matter who is running....Newt cannot overcome his past, and he’s an agnostic...I heard him say so, and the religious right will not vote for him in the end. Too much infidelity and baggage on the environment, ad with Pelosi, and his 1.5 million from Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae?
It was an easy question... it was your answer that was kinda dumb.
LOL... But there’s good news. You have no idea what you’re talking about.
You’re not interested in facts, instead, you would rather just make crap up as you go along, such as Newt being “agnostic”.
He’s Catholic, but you already knew that and that fact doesn’t fit into your ‘lying points’..... Disgusting.
I wouldn’t presume to tell you who to vote for. The most I can, and should do is point out the characteristics of those who we should not support.
Gingrich is a decent conservative, but is easily log-rolled.
Romney is essentially a democRAT without the sordid sexual history.
Bachmann has potential, but she is easily flustered. I’m not sure if that’s due to her overall lack of traction, and looking to grab on to anything to get her exposure.
Perry also has potential, but I remain skeptical as he was a democRAT at one time.
Santorum has possibilities but is not a forceful a speaker as is needed to win a bare knuckles campaign as this one is going to be.
Paul....he’s just plain nuts.
Huntsman is just another democRAT wannabe.
Cain would have been good but that’s a done deal.
After that...vote for the most reliably conservative person there, whether or not you think that they can or will win.
In order to marry a Catholic you must become one, but I HEARD him say he was more ‘agnostic’, so was he lying a couple of months ago when I heard him say it at a book signing.
In order to marry a Catholic you must become one, but I HEARD him say he was more ‘agnostic’, so was he lying a couple of months ago when I heard him say it at a book signing.
Go to the corner and talk to yourself. I don’t talk to loons.
We live in Iowa and I can tell you that we have been receiving 2-5 pcs of anti-Newt mail every single day for the last week.
It’s become so negative that I think a lot of people will revolt by voting FOR Newt.
I’ve already grown sick of this crap and will be happy when the caucus is over.
No problem....maybe I misunderstood his answer to the agnostic question.
Thank you for the on site information! The campaign against him by his so-called “friends” is stunning by its vile.
I hope a revolt vote will take place at enough caucuses to give Gingrich the win, but I really hope that the caucus goers will vote for him because he’s the best equipped to be POTUS & CIC, and also to stop Romney and defeat the Marxist.
I trust you’re going to caucus and lead the way!
Merry CHRISTmas!
Actually, to be married in the Church, at the Alter, both bride and groom must be Catholic. Newt Gingrich is a devout convert to Catholicism.
Merry CHRISTmas.
Okay. ;>)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.