Posted on 11/17/2011 10:04:23 AM PST by servo1969
It only covered heterosexual relations because homosexual relations were illegal. Should we make them illegal again or should we pick a specific age for when you can start doing weird things as opposed to standard missionary? Pick an age 16-18-whatever and move on.
I don’t know. Actually I think he wanted to mention the racial aspect of this, but didn’t know how to do it without creating a controversy and ending up becoming a part of the media firestorm around the scandal.
Everything this despicable man does is under cover and corrupt. The words slimy, evil, narcissistic, devious, deviate, come to mind when you think of oboma.
For those of you who do not know oboma’s sexual history, google Man's Country, a men's gay bar on Clark Street in Chicago. This is an old haunt of oboma and rahm emanuel. The complete story of oboma’s sexualty is contained on many posts here on Free Republic.
Evil is as evil does. We must protect our children from deviant homosexuals who prey on them. We must clean out this infestation as you would any pestilence.
What he wants to ask is this:
Is Sandusky a homosexual first, or a pedophile first?
At what point is the homosexual community going to step up and OWN this problem. The PSU president VOWED to make that campus the most LBGT friendly campus in the nation and LOOK WHAT IT DID TO THEM!!!
THAT’s what he wants to say. Brett Ratner got hammered for saying ‘fag’. Nobody’s safe.
They’ve successfully equated being gay with being black. ‘Fag’ is the new ‘Nigger’, apparently. Gay people can’t be sexists, just like black people can’t be racists.
And the very, very last thing you can do is suggest that being gay is a disease. Being a pedophile apparently, for now, still is, but not being gay. Gay and pedophile, at this point, have NOTHING to do with each other.
You think I’m wrong? Look it up in the DSM-IV. It’s there in black and white, for all the good that’s worth.
Gay is wrecking the country. That’s what he wants to say.
I've noticed this since his drug case. I imagine he doesn't want to sound hypocritical about personal compulsions.
My comment was an observation and a question. It was not a complaint. Reporting missing children, reporting sexual abuse of children and other crimes is not garbage until the coverage is saturation & exploitive for ratings.
Rush’s focus on political issues is his strength as well as a public service. He does however, comment on sports and other miscellaneous topics. With respect to criminal suspects and ‘alleged’ crimes - he may not want to risk legal challenges of bias or slander. i.e. Nancy Grace and Rita Cosby.
The hormonal temperment of a woman.
The strength and bloody resolve of a man.
This is homosexuals.
Nambla has marched openly in homo pride parades especially in San Fran hundreds of times.
“He’s dead silent about it.”
I don’t know when he went silent, but he did.
Makes me wonder how filthy strong the sodomite activists are.
“You think I’m wrong? Look it up in the DSM-IV. It’s there in black and white, for all the good that’s worth.”
The sodomite activists used the same tactics they used against Dr. Laura to get the DSM changed. The changes are in no way supported by science—not even psychiatry.
People like Rush Limbaugh are seriously deficient in moral courage.
If enough of these people who have audiences and can influence people spoke the truth, great good would happen. But Rush and people like him are either on board with the sodomy/pederasty agenda or moral cowards. There is no third option.
Rush has ignored the homosexual agenda for 20 years. He used to talk a little about it and then stopped; someone up the thread mentioned something about it.
He’s a moral coward or doesn’t mind it. Doesn’t mind that the homosexual agenda is destroying the Constitutionally guaranteed freedoms of speech, religion and association and working on property too.
Hmosexuals have been well known throughout history to be inclined to pederasty. It’s their “thing”.
Moral cowardice is why the fags have so much power, although they are no more than 2% if that.
Men like ‘em young, whether they’re gay or straight, it’s boys or jail-bait.
Normal men are not attracted to pre-pubescent females or even young teenage girls of 13 to 15 years old. They may look cute to them, but a normal man is not going to be tempted to molest them.
Homosexuals, OTOH, commits at least 1/3 of all child molestations, and this figure may not even include children in puberty.
It is very common for homosexual men to molest/seduce adolescents as young as 12 years old or even younger.
Then there's the pornification of our lives. When I was younger, the pervasiveness of porn did not distress me as much as it does now. I thought it was like the Playboy magazines that young men had in a limited phase of their lives. Now everything is fetishized...
Our culture has led men to believe that anything goes, and I believe that many young men are born straight, only to be seduced and abused into misery and sin.
And the natural bent of men is for the nubile and the fresh--look at all these old guys who can't get their motor running unless their women have the appearance of puberty.
Normal men can act immorally or morally.
Homosexuals cannot act morally unless they become celibate.
And homosexuals obviously cannot control themselves, as history proves; a few can change if they desire - in fact, more than a few - but the fact that they can is hidden from the public.
If homosexuals continue to identify with their perverted desires, they will act on them, and most or a very large proportion are attracted to young boys. And I agree with you about the porn, in fact I just pinged an article about it.
Should have added - many homosexual pedophiles and pederasts “groom” their victims and often use “gay porn” after the victim trusts them. Sick.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.